Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident reports hazardous, deteriorating property; city staff says abatement and police options available
Summary
A Woodland resident raised concerns during public comment about a deteriorated house and tenant safety; code enforcement told council it has sent notices, will make targeted outreach and can pursue abatement and liens if voluntary compliance fails.
WOODLAND, Wash. — During public comment at the Feb. 18 Woodland City Council meeting a resident reported that a nearby property is in severe disrepair, has produced emergency responses that could not locate a residence, and is creating safety and neighborhood concerns. Code enforcement staff told the council the city has an abatement process and will escalate outreach to the known owner.
The resident (identified on the record as Miss Brown) said she had been emailing with city code enforcement and described a front house that is “inhabitable” except for rodents, with tenants living behind it. She said emergency responders were unable to locate the occupied unit on two occasions, once forcing a door‑to‑door check when a caller reported a choking emergency.
Miss Brown said she works in real estate and that the condition of the property is frustrating to neighbors, especially given rising property taxes and community efforts such as Planters Days. She asked the council whether it could do anything further to address the property beyond routine code enforcement steps.
City response and available actions
City staff (Bridal, code enforcement) responded that the city does maintain an abatement code. Staff said they have made multiple attempts to notify the owner — mailings and door knocks — and that the next step is targeted outreach using a staff member with a direct phone number for the owner to try to secure voluntary remediation. Bridal said the city has committed to reach out to the identified owner the following day.
If outreach and notice do not produce corrective action, Bridal said the city may pursue abatement itself and impose penalties; those penalties can accrue and the city may place a lien against the property. Staff said the city generally prefers cooperative compliance but will use financial leverage when necessary.
Law enforcement and parking complaints
Staff and councilors noted that motor‑vehicle issues (for example, vehicles parked illegally or obstructively) fall under police authority. Staff said Sergeant Lipp and the police department have worked with code enforcement in the past to address vehicle problems at the park‑and‑ride and other locations.
How to report
Bridal noted the city maintains an online portal for citizen complaints so residents can file code or parking complaints for follow up. Staff said they would follow up with Miss Brown and expected to escalate enforcement efforts now that the property owner has been identified.
No formal council action was taken during public comment; staff said they will follow up with the resident and pursue abatement procedures if necessary.
