Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Development Code Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Deltona planning board recommends code overhaul to streamline permit reviews, shifts some review thresholds
Summary
The Deltona Planning & Zoning Board voted 7-0 to recommend City Commission approval of Ordinance 4-25, which revises administrative chapters of the Land Development Code to clarify review authorities, create a minor conditional-use process and require community meetings for many zoning applications.
The Deltona Planning & Zoning Board voted 7-0 on Monday to recommend that the City Commission approve Ordinance 4-25, a package of amendments to the city’s Land Development Code that reorganizes permit procedures and moves several review authorities into a single administrative chapter.
The ordinance, presented by Alexis Crespo of consultant firm RVI, consolidates scattered application procedures into chapter 74, clarifies which board or staff position reviews or approves each permit type, and adds procedural rules intended to reduce staff time spent guiding applicants through review steps.
Crespo told the board the package is chiefly procedural. “The amendment before you this evening is some amendments to your Land Development Code,” she said, and described the work as an effort to make the code “more user friendly” by listing each application type and its review authority in one place.
Board members pressed staff on several substantive points during the presentation and discussion. Key changes and clarifications included:
- Minor conditional uses and minor variances: The ordinance establishes a new minor conditional-use category that can be decided by the Planning & Zoning Board (rather than automatically going to the City Commission) for small-scale requests such as a small church under a specified seating threshold or small day-care facilities. The package also allows some minor variances to be approved by the planning and development services director.
- Citizen awareness and neighborhood meetings: The amendment adds a new “citizen awareness and participation” section requiring applicants for rezonings, variances, major conditional uses and similar applications to hold a community meeting with nearby residents and submit a report summarizing concerns and proposed responses. Jordan (city staff) explained the city did not previously have a formal mechanism for requiring such meetings.
- Public noticing and posting: Staff said applicants will pick up signs from the city and be responsible for posting them; the city will continue certified mailings. Applicants must provide photo documentation and a signed affidavit showing where and when signs were posted; staff will retain that evidence in the application file.
- Sunshine Law and administrative approvals: Crespo noted a concern that Development Review Committee (DRC) communications risked running afoul of the Sunshine Law if the committee issued approvals without appropriate public record or director signoff; the ordinance clarifies approval authority and director responsibilities.
- Final plats and review thresholds: The package keeps final plat review largely ministerial but the board discussed the threshold that determines which plats the P&Z board reviews. Members expressed concern that the existing 200-lot threshold rarely brings plats to the board. During discussion the board directed staff to change the subdivision threshold; the motion forwarded to the commission included revising the subdivision threshold to 100 or more lots and adding a provision that the P&Z board be allowed to make a recommendation on annexation applications.
Board member (unnamed) moved that the P&Z board recommend the City Commission approve Ordinance 4-25, including the annexation recommendation and revising subdivisions to 100 or more lots; a second was recorded and the motion passed 7-0.
Why it matters: The amendments consolidate procedural text that was scattered across chapters, reduce duplication, and create a faster path for low-impact applications while adding required early community engagement for potentially contentious cases. The package does not change zoning standards themselves but reallocates who reviews and approves a range of permits and aims to reduce staff effort on routine matters.
Next steps: The board’s recommendation will be transmitted to the City Commission for public hearing and final action; the ordinance as moved includes the annexation recommendation and the reduced plat threshold.
