Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Grade Level Realignment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Perkiomen Valley administrators recommend 5-6 center at West, 7-8 center at East amid space and service concerns

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District leaders presented a proposal to move fifth graders into a West-based 5-6 center and place seventh–eighth graders at East to address crowded elementary classrooms, expand targeted services and create more aligned transitions; no board vote was taken and officials said the recommendation will go to the board later this spring.

Dr. Barbara Russell, superintendent of Perkiomen Valley School District, presented an administration recommendation to reorganize grade levels so that fifth and sixth graders would attend a consolidated 5-6 center at Middle School West and seventh and eighth graders would attend a 7-8 center at Middle School East. "Nothing will be approved this evening. This is informational and an opportunity to ask questions," Russell told the community during the district's public meeting.

District leaders said the plan responds to growing, diverse service needs in elementary grades, classroom-space constraints and a desire to improve targeted instruction and transitions between grade levels. Russell said the district is aiming to "cultivate inclusive school communities" and believes the 5-6/7-8 alignment would better concentrate specialized staff, therapists and counselors where students need them.

Principals and administrators outlined the educational and operational rationale. Ryan Creedon, principal at Middle School West, said the transition from fifth to sixth grade "is the most stressful transition for our students" and argued that placing fifth and sixth graders together would allow staff to focus on shared developmental needs. He said bringing all fifth-grade teachers together in one building would improve collaboration and consistency of instruction.

Administrators also listed practical benefits. Assistant to the superintendent Mr. Mitchell and others described potential gains in curriculum alignment, earlier access to enrichment such as STEM programming, and the possibility of counselors following student cohorts for more than one year to improve continuity of support.

District staff acknowledged challenges the plan would create. Mr. Dave DeAndrea, principal at Middle School East, and other administrators raised concerns about athletics and extracurriculars (several current teams operate separately at East and West), student leadership opportunities that currently exist at fifth grade in elementary schools, and the potential for longer bus rides for families on the district's geographic edges. DeAndrea said, "Our fifth [grade] is the first sort of student leadership opportunity... What does that mean for those students if we plan next year?"

Transportationstaff said they are modeling a three-tier bus schedule to keep ride times within the district threshold of about 45 minutes. The district presented two mock-up routes as examples: a Collegeville-to-West route (about 11–12 miles, 13 stops, estimated ~40 minutes without heavy traffic) and a Skippack-to-West route (about 16 miles, 15 stops in the draft model). The district's chief information officer, Mr. Ganesh, said a three-tier system can reduce stops per run and may offer per-diem cost savings for the district.

Parents raised concerns during the Q&A about longer commutes for elementary students, the impact on after-school activities, and student health. One parent identified only as a resident told the board she has a kindergartner with medication-resistant epilepsy and said she was worried about longer bus rides without medical personnel on board. Russell acknowledged the concern and said medical and safety implications "have to be talked about much more" in further planning.

Administrators presented alternatives they considered: an early learning center at Evergreen (K–2 or K–1 models were shown, with projected enrollments for the K–2 model of Evergreen ~899, Schwenksville ~337, Skippack ~280 and South ~331); a 5–8 model (combining 5–8 at each middle school); and maintaining the status quo. The administration continued to recommend the 5-6 center at West and 7-8 at East as their preferred option.

Officials said additional analysis and public engagement are planned before any decision: a community meeting in February, an FAQs web page and a formal presentation to the board in March, followed by a board vote later this spring. The district is also conducting an enrollment study with the Montgomery County Planning Commission to refine long-term projections and consider whether facility expansions might be preferable.

No formal motion or board action occurred at the meeting. Russell closed by again stressing that the presentation was informational and that staff will post the meeting recording and related materials online.

Ending: The board will receive further briefings and data, including the county enrollment study and detailed transportation routing, before making any decision. The district said it will publish an FAQ and host additional community meetings to solicit input and answer operational questions before sending a recommendation to the full board for a vote.