Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Comments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge investigation into alleged threats and criticize TIF spending during public comments

2349730 · February 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Two residents used public comment time to ask supervisors to investigate alleged corruption and threats, and to criticize tax increment financing and downtown incentives.

Two residents raised sharply different concerns during the Board of Supervisors' public-comment period on Feb. 18.

Aaron Stacy Roberts of Palmer Street told the board he has experienced threatening text messages and threats to his family and asked county law enforcement to investigate what he described as sustained wrongdoing. Roberts compared his situation to historical corruption cases and said previous efforts to report the incidents led to his being referred for a mental-health evaluation. "I didn't own the gun, still don't," Roberts said, and he asked the board to direct someone to look into his allegations.

Lifetime Black Hawk County resident Forrest Delabue addressed the supervisors about tax increment financing (TIF). Delabue criticized recent downtown incentives and said developers had received large taxpayer-backed incentives that he sees as taking money away from schools and other taxing bodies. He cited a $6.2 million bond-backed incentive to a developer for a conversion of the city hall property and a $2.5 million nonrefundable incentive for a grocery store that later closed, leaving the county with little return. "Please take care of our tax dollars," Delabue told the board.

Why it matters: public comment gives residents a formal opportunity to raise concerns to elected supervisors. The board and staff may choose to respond by directing investigations, requesting reports from law enforcement or referring policy questions to future agendas.

Board response: The supervisors acknowledged the speakers and moved on with the meeting; no formal motions were recorded to initiate investigations or policy changes during the meeting.