Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Oversight topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves proposal to create ongoing capital oversight role; fiscal questions remain
Summary
Lawmakers voted to create a standing oversight function for Capitol complex management, potentially housed in the Legislative Service Bureau (LSB). Debate centered on where the position should sit, its full- or part-time status, and fiscal impact; the committee passed the bill with changes and without specifying administration placement.
Senate Bill 171, which would establish a permanent legislative oversight function for capital management and create a liaison/coordinator role within state administration, passed the committee after extended discussion about structure, supervision and fiscal impact.
Sponsor Minority Leader Curt Kurt said the bill is intended to create regular public oversight of taxpayer dollars used on the Capitol and the Capitol complex. Kurt said he has reviewed models used in other states and prefers a moderate approach rather than creating a new agency; the bill as discussed proposed housing the role in the Legislative Service Bureau but sponsors said the position could be reallocated if another office (such as the pro tem or speaker office) is more practical.
Committee members pressed on cost and staffing. Kurt said the Legislative Service Bureau estimated a maximum fiscal impact if the position were full time at roughly $93,500 plus equipment; he and others said they expect the role could be half-time or less in practice and that staffing decisions could be adjusted.
The committee adopted an instruction to strike title to continue negotiations over administration and oversight placement and then voted the bill out of committee. The measure passed committee on a recorded vote and will move forward for further legislative consideration.
