Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Government Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee approves bill restricting DEI programs in state agencies and higher education
Summary
The Oklahoma Senate committee passed Senate Bill 1006, which prohibits state agencies and institutions of higher education from supporting or funding diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) positions, offices or compulsory DEI training. The measure drew extended debate over definitions, enforcement and impacts on campus programs.
Get email alerts on the Government Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Oklahoma State Senate Committee on Retirement and Government Resources voted to pass Senate Bill 1006, a measure that would prohibit state agencies and public institutions of higher education from granting, supporting or funding diversity, equity and inclusion positions, departments or activities funded with taxpayer dollars.
Sponsor Senator Lonnie Bullard, who presented the bill, said it targets taxpayer-funded DEI activities and aims to return hiring and program decisions to merit-based criteria. "DEI is in complete violation," Bullard said during debate, arguing the policy cannot survive strict scrutiny as a government-funded program.
Opponents, led by Minority Leader Curt Kurt and Senator Kaylee Boren, warned the bill’s language is broad and could chill constitutionally protected activity or widely used campus programming. Senator Boren cited student fees used for campus Christian events and asked whether the bill would unintentionally prohibit those activities; Bullard said the bill targets taxpayer-funded items and that student fees are different, and he offered to work on clarifying language.
Senator Allison Bourne expressed concerns about the bill’s enforcement provisions. Bourne warned that the measure’s penalty—loss of state appropriations for agencies found in violation—could create a “tattletale” environment in which frequent complaints trigger investigations and chill benign campus programming and student clubs.
Committee members also questioned several definitions in the bill, including “indoctrinate,” “preferential treatment” and how the proposal would treat programs aimed at recruitment or retention for underrepresented or geographically isolated students. Bill proponents repeatedly stressed the intent is to prohibit compelled or forced programs that give preferential treatment on prohibited grounds, not voluntary affinity groups or merit-based programs.
The committee adopted the measure on a 6-2 vote. Several senators said they were open to further technical changes in conference so the bill does not unintentionally affect non-DEI programs such as certain recruitment or student-club activities.
The bill now advances in the Senate process for additional consideration.
