Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Project Delivery topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Caltrans outlines toolbox of techniques to speed project delivery while preserving oversight
Summary
Caltrans design division described tools — from NEPA delegation and programmatic agreements to cost‑plus‑time contracts and accelerated bridge construction — intended to shorten delivery timelines and limit traveler impacts on non‑emergency projects.
Get email alerts on the Project Delivery topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Terry Abbott, design division chief at Caltrans, told the Transportation Commission the department maintains a “project delivery acceleration toolbox” — a catalog of techniques the agency uses to accelerate non‑emergency projects while staying within existing rules and regulations.
Abbott said the toolbox, maintained since about 2002, includes process standardization and training but that his presentation focused on project development and contracting methods such as NEPA delegation, peer permit engineering evaluation reports for small local encroachments, and PACT (a template‑based approach for cooperative agreements). “We set ourselves a goal of having 80% of the co op agreements completed within 60 days,” he said, and reported the department has achieved that goal.
On permitting and environmental streamlining, Abbott highlighted programmatic agreements — for example with the State Historic Preservation Officer (Section 106) and with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biological opinions — that reduce case‑by‑case negotiations when agreed conditions are met.
On contracting innovations Abbott described construction partnering (a facilitated kickoff to set communication and escalation ladders), cost‑plus‑time bidding and incentive/disincentive provisions to shorten on‑pavement time, flexible start dates to allow contractors to choose optimal start windows, and accelerated bridge construction using prefabricated elements. He said these methods are used to reduce public impacts and to lower claims and delays.
Abbott summarized pilot and authorized delivery models: design sequencing (a limited authority that has expired but has active projects under construction), design‑build (with two projects remaining under authority through December 2013), and construction manager/general contractor (CM/GC) legislation moving through the Legislature as AB 2498.
He also described investments in digital design and construction tools — mobile LiDAR survey systems capable of collecting survey‑grade points at highway speeds, 3‑D constructability reviews, collision/conflict detection software, and machine guidance that shares design files directly with contractors’ GPS equipment.
Abbott noted that MAP‑21 (the federal transportation law) has made permanent the NEPA delegation and elevated the earlier experimental CM/GC authority, allowing their broader use going forward.
Commissioners asked for examples of timelines and the presentation prompted discussion of how the commission and Caltrans can encourage other agencies to move projects more quickly without sacrificing environmental and safety safeguards.

