Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tribal Taxation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee agrees to gather more information on tribal taxation language in House Bill 15 63
Summary
Members asked sponsors to clarify whether House Bill 15 63 should direct a study or require consideration of tribal-tax issues; committee deferred substantive action and planned follow-up meetings with legislative counsel and stakeholders.
Senators discussed House Bill 15 63, a bill addressing taxation of tribal and allotted lands, and decided to gather more information before taking committee action. The committee did not vote on the bill but agreed to meet with the sponsor, legislative counsel and stakeholders to clarify the bill's scope and whether statutory language should read "shall consider" or stronger language such as "shall study."
Senator Marschley (bill carrier on the Senate side) and others said the current draft uses "shall consider" language. Members and the sponsor discussed the risk that changing the language to "shall study" could affect the bill's path (for example, potential conference actions) and possibly the bill's survival later in the process. Brad Hawk, identified in committee discussion as the Indian commissioner, volunteered space for meetings with legislative counsel and interested parties.
Committee members outlined topics a study might include: federal limits on tribal taxation, judicial decisions on tribal taxation authority, state property-tax exemptions for Native American property, and interactions between tribal sovereignty and state law. Several senators requested more specific issue framing before amending bill language.
No formal motion was recorded. The committee agreed Speaker sponsors and legislative counsel would meet and return to committee for a quick decision after the Senate floor adjourned.
Committee members flagged the need for clarity and stakeholder meetings; they did not adopt a formal recommendation during the meeting.
