Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lafayette planners pitch zoning overhaul to implement Legacy Lafayette, including ‘missing‑middle’ and neighborhood business options
Summary
Staff and consultant presented a draft land‑use code update that would broaden residential options (duplexes/triplexes on corner lots), add civic mixed‑use allowances and simplify zoning districts; city will start public engagement and draft development standards next.
Get email alerts on the Land Use Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City planning staff and consultants briefed the Lafayette City Council on Feb. 18 on a public‑review draft of a comprehensive land‑use code update intended to implement the Legacy Lafayette comprehensive plan.
The presentation outlined a three‑module drafting schedule, new and consolidated zoning districts, and proposed changes the project team said would make the code more predictable and user‑friendly. Phil Kleisler, planning and building department staff, introduced the project and Elizabeth Garvin, lead consultant with Clarion, described the draft updates.
Key proposals: Garvin and Kleisler said the draft will expand housing choices by allowing more ‘missing‑middle’ forms — duplexes, triplexes and townhomes — under limited circumstances: notably on corner residential lots and on lots that front collector streets, and where a duplex or townhome already exists on the lot before adoption. The draft also contemplates civic mixed‑use allowances so institutional campuses (churches, schools, hospitals) could add housing, and it proposes neighborhood‑serving retail allowances — small retail uses of up to 2,000 square feet — in some residential corners to support walkable commercial activity.
Other technical changes include: consolidating similar zoning districts to reduce confusion, shifting from widespread planned unit development toward more base zoning to preserve flexibility, adopting form‑based standards in some districts to focus on building placement and design, updating use tables with clearer definitions and use‑specific standards, and reducing nonconforming situations that freeze reinvestment.
Why it matters: The draft attempt to translate Legacy Lafayette policy goals into enforceable regulations. Garvin said the project aims to “create more predictable development outcomes” and “right‑size the development review process” so lower‑impact changes can be approved administratively while higher‑impact projects continue to require public hearings.
Public and advisory input: Vicki Eulen, a member of the Land Use Code Working Group, told council she appreciated staff outreach and emphasized the working group’s view that proposals allowing multi‑unit housing and neighborhood retail should receive broader public notice because “they’ll be a surprise to many Lafayette residents and businesses.” Councilors asked staff to coordinate the zoning changes with the multimodal transportation plan and to consider special protections for established neighborhoods such as Old Town.
Next steps: Staff said the districts and uses public review draft is complete and that module two (development standards on parking, lighting and landscaping) is underway. The project team plans expanded public engagement later this year, a staff review of module two in mid‑March and further Working Group and council updates in April.
What council said: Council members generally praised the outreach and emphasized caution on protections for neighborhood character and traffic impacts. Councilor Lawrence noted the Senior Advisory Board’s participation in the working group and asked that transportation impacts be analyzed if corner lot duplex allowances proceed.

