Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Downtown Transportation And Litter Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Montpelier planning commissioners authorize chair to sign $200,000 downtown transportation fund application
Summary
The Montpelier Planning Commission authorized the chair to sign a $200,000 grant application to the Downtown Transportation Fund to assess and repair streetlights, convert seasonal bridge lighting to year‑round, illuminate pedestrian bridges and pilot self‑compacting trash receptacles; Montpelier Alive will provide a $40,000 match.
The Montpelier Planning Commission voted to authorize the commission chair to sign a $200,000 grant application to the Downtown Transportation Fund to pay for streetlight assessments, expanded bridge lighting and a pilot for self‑compacting trash receptacles downtown.
Josh, planning department staff, described the proposal as a joint effort with Montpelier Alive and said, “We are requesting $200,000, to use funds to do streetlight assessments.” He said nearly two dozen downtown streetlights have been inoperable since the flood and that a portion of the grant would convert seasonal holiday lighting on the Main Street and Taylor Street bridges to year‑round systems and add stronger lighting to two pedestrian bridges near Shaw’s and downstream from the transit center, plus the Spring Street bridge.
Josh also said the project includes piloting new self‑compacting trash and recycling receptacles at two high‑use locations on State Street to address recurring complaints about overflowing trash. “Public works and Montpelier Live consistently get complaints from businesses, residents about these areas have of overflowing trash,” he said.
The staff presentation said Montpelier Alive will provide a $40,000 match funded by a federal tourism grant for the bridge work, bringing the total project cost to about $240,000.
Gabe made the motion to authorize the chair to sign the grant application; Erin seconded. The commission chair called for the vote and recorded ayes, and the motion carried.
The commission did not record any opposed votes or abstentions during the motion. Staff said public works would administer the pilot receptacles if the grant is awarded and that further implementation details would follow if the application succeeds.
The commission followed its usual procedure of hearing the staff overview, asking clarifying questions, and taking a single motion to authorize the chair’s signature on the application. There was no separate formal vote recorded in the transcript on the content of the application beyond the authorization to sign.
