Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Jail Healthcare Malpractice Reimbursement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill to reimburse counties for jail medical malpractice judgments, 10-3
Summary
House Bill 17-43, which would establish a reimbursement process for medical malpractice judgments or settlements against community-based healthcare providers delivering services in jails, was reported out of committee with a due-pass recommendation by a 10-3 vote after legislators debated trade-offs between access to care and taxpayer liability.
The Civil Rights & Judiciary Committee on Feb. 19 reported out House Bill 17-43 by a 10-3 vote. The bill would create a process under which the state reimburses counties for medical malpractice judgments or settlements against community-based healthcare providers delivering healthcare services in jails.
Vice Chair Farvar moved the bill and described it as “incredibly important” to ensure access to and quality of healthcare in jails. Farvar said the legislation would use a reimbursement process to reduce the burden on counties that contract for jail healthcare and noted coordination with the Office of the Insurance Commissioner to study malpractice issues in correctional settings.
Opponents warned that the bill could remove individual liability for providers and shift financial responsibility to other taxpayers. Representative Grama said the measure “takes away responsibility from the actual individuals that may be committing malpractice” and would shift costs to taxpayers. Representative Burnett said the bill addresses a valid concern but recommended further discussion to find better fixes.
After debate, staff called the roll. The committee vote was recorded with 10 ayes and 3 nays; the clerk announced the tally as 10 ayes and 3 nays and the committee reported HB 17-43 with a due-pass recommendation.
Why it matters: counties contract with community-based providers to deliver medical services in jails. The bill’s reimbursement mechanism would affect county budgets, provider risk exposure and potentially the availability of medical providers willing to serve in correctional settings.
Next steps: HB 17-43 will proceed with a due-pass recommendation to subsequent legislative steps per House rules.
