Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Telecom Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves conditional-use permit for Arcola Towers cell site aimed at closing service gap
Summary
The Louisa County Board of Supervisors on Feb. 18 approved a conditional‑use permit for a monopole wireless communications tower on Charles Lane intended to improve Verizon Wireless coverage between the Ferncliff and Louisa growth areas.
The Louisa County Board of Supervisors on Feb. 18 approved a conditional‑use permit for a monopole wireless communications tower on Charles Lane intended to improve Verizon Wireless coverage in the area between the Ferncliff and Louisa growth areas.
Tom Eglin Jr., deputy director of the county’s Community Development Department, presented the application for CUP2024‑08, describing the site as a proposed monopole telecommunications tower and summarizing staff materials: the county comprehensive plan designation, a letter of intent from Verizon, the planning commission recommendation for approval with 21 conditions, and a county consultant recommendation contingent on the completion of a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review. Eglin said a NEPA study was in process.
Jonathan Yates, representing Arcola Towers, told the board the facility would be a monopole designed for Verizon with space for three additional broadband carriers. He said the site was selected to reduce a “deficit” or coverage gap along Courthouse Road and nearby neighborhoods; the company had FAA and State Historic Preservation Office reviews showing no hazard and no effect on historic resources. Arcola Towers representatives said tower erection would be rapid once permits and regulatory clearances were complete and that Verizon had committed to locating on the tower.
Board members asked about timing and enforcement of completion. Staff pointed to a condition in the planning commission’s set requiring the facility to become operational within two years of approval, with one administrative one‑year extension permitted if needed; board members noted this condition addressed prior situations in which permits were approved but towers stood unbuilt for many years.
After no public speakers at the hearing, the board voted to approve CUP2024‑08. The motion carried unanimously.
Staff noted remaining steps before construction — final site plan, building permits, and completion of the NEPA review — and said the applicant would need to satisfy those before the county issues permits and the tower becomes operational.
