Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Lawmakers hear wide-ranging testimony on Fish and Wildlife Commission reform; two bills debated at public hearing
Summary
The Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee heard public testimony Feb. 19 on two competing bills to change governance of the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission: HB 16-85 (would shift the commission to an advisory role and make the director the executive) and HB 19-30 (would change appointment and regional representation).
The House Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee held a lengthy public hearing Feb. 19 on competing proposals to change how the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission is structured and how commissioners are appointed.
House Bill 16-85, presented by Representative Springer, would make the commission an advisory body and establish the director of the Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) as the agency's executive and administrative head; it would also create an interagency work group for issues that significantly affect fish and wildlife. Representative Springer described the bill as the start of a longer process to address perceived dysfunction and to find a more "fair, balanced" structure.
House Bill 19-30, presented by Ranking Member Dent, would change the commission's composition and appointment process: six commissioners would be appointed by county legislative authorities from each of DFW's six regions (one from each region), and three at-large members would be appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate; the bill would require that nominees have held a hunting or fishing…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
