Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commercial Development Copper Woods topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers, staff discuss parking, access and timing for Copper Woods commercial phase
Summary
Developer and city staff reviewed two commercial layout options at Copper Woods, debated parking calculations and access points, and set planning‑commission submission deadlines tied to March 12 consideration.
Get email alerts on the Commercial Development Copper Woods topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developers seeking to build commercial space in the Copper Woods development presented two layout options and discussed parking, access and scheduling with Harrisville staff.
A developer representative working with the Thompsons said the project team prefers the split configuration because “it breaks it up” and creates more end‑cap units that the market prefers. The representative described the two plans as roughly 10,500 square feet and 12,000 square feet and said the shorter plan might still deliver similar leasing income because of additional end caps.
City staff and the project team discussed parking rules and how they apply. The developer said the designer found a line in the code that reads “5 per thousand,” and the parties debated whether that figure is a minimum or maximum; staff said parking requirements vary by commercial type but indicated planning staff are inclined to allow additional parking to serve adjacent townhomes. The developers asked whether a lot split or subdivision amendment would be possible to separate the commercial parcel for financing; staff said a plat amendment or lot split is viable but warned that cross‑access and parking shared‑use agreements would be advisable to protect residents’ parking access.
Staff discussed access and circulation; the applicant added a proposed entrance to improve retail visibility, and fire and public‑works staff asked the team to check corner clearance and stacking. The city also told the team the deadline to submit materials for the planning commission’s March meeting is Feb. 25; Jenny Knight, the city administrator, said, “The deadline for March's meeting is February 25.” If the application is complete by that date, planning commission consideration is scheduled for March 12. Staff also said typical plan‑review delays come from securing documentation from the sewer district and impact‑fee calculations.
City staff said they could tentatively schedule the item for the March 12 planning commission meeting once the applicant submits the site plan application, preliminary elevations and any plat‑amendment materials. Staff also warned the team that drive‑through service, if later proposed, will trigger stacking and building‑location considerations and potentially different impact‑fee calculations.

