Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee reviews H.2 changes: raises juvenile entry age, delays raise-the-age implementation and adds disputed custody authority

2345086 · February 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Draft 3.1 of H.2 would raise the minimum age for family-division delinquency jurisdiction from 10 to 12, extend juvenile jurisdiction timeframes, delay the Raise-the-Age implementation for 19-year-olds to July 1, 2027, and add a disputed provision allowing a disposition order to direct the commissioner to take "physical custody" of those who have attained 18 but are younger than 22.

Draft 3.1 of H.2 was the focus of a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that walked through three principal changes to juvenile delinquency law: raising the initial age of family-division jurisdiction from 10 to 12; lengthening how long a youth can remain under family-division jurisdiction; and postponing the April 1 implementation of the Raise-the-Age provisions that would bring 19-year-olds into family-division jurisdiction until July 1, 2027. The draft also adds a contested new option allowing a disposition order to direct the Department for Children and Families (DCF) commissioner to take "physical custody" of people who have attained 18 but are under 22.

The bill’s drafter, Eric Fitzpatrick of the Office of Legislative Council, told the committee that sections 1 and 2 amend family-division jurisdiction by changing the starting age from 10 to 12 and by extending the court’s ability to keep youth under juvenile jurisdiction for an additional year beyond current practice. Fitzpatrick summarized the Raise-the-Age portion as striking the draft’s current April 1 effective date and replacing it with a two-year pause that would set implementation on July 1, 2027. He also described a new reporting and transition-planning requirement tied to that delayed implementation: three required progress reports (December this year, July next year, and December next year) to Judiciary and Justice Oversight bodies, and a mandated transition plan for cases that began in criminal court shortly before the new juvenile implementation date but would have started as family-division cases after…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans