Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grading And Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Exam committee proposes eliminating semester finals; board discusses grading system change and rounding policy
Summary
An exam committee recommended removing semester exams and counting grading periods differently; the board discussed grading software replacement after the state discontinued LiveGrades, debated teacher discretion to round grades, and agreed to revisit the committee’s guidelines in about a year.
An exam committee reported a proposal to eliminate traditional semester finals and instead weight grading periods differently; committee members recorded a strong majority in favor of the approach during their internal vote.
The committee’s written proposal would alter grading language and how final grades are calculated; the committee reported an internal vote (recorded in the meeting notes) of 22 in favor and 1 opposed for “no exams” with an alternative weighting model described to the board. The transcript shows committee members and teachers highlighted alternative assessments — portfolios and presentations — and noted that Advanced Placement (AP) classes already include frequent testing.
Board members and staff discussed technical and operational changes needed to implement the proposal. Several speakers said the state has discontinued the LiveGrades grading system the district had used; district staff are testing alternatives, including a system referred to in the discussion as “Move 2” and the learning management product Schoology. One staff member named in the discussion, Justin Kiper, has been testing the alternative system.
Rounding of final grades was debated. Committee participants reported agreement in principle that an 89.5 would round to a 90, and some teachers present said they preferred to retain professional discretion to round when warranted. Board members highlighted that teachers are the teacher of record and that any rounding practice would need to be set up in the grading system and clearly described in guidelines.
The committee proposed revisiting the guidelines after about one year to assess whether the changes worked as intended.
Why it matters: Changes to final exam policy and grade calculation affect classroom assessment practice, student preparation for standardized tests and AP coursework, and district grading records and software needs. The state’s removal of LiveGrades requires the district to choose and configure a replacement, which could affect teacher workflow and recordkeeping.
What the record shows: The transcript records a committee recommendation and detailed discussion; it does not show a formal board vote adopting the committee proposal at this meeting. Board members directed staff to test software options and to monitor implementation and to bring the item back for review after about a year.
Next steps: District staff will continue testing grading platforms (Justin Kiper is testing one option) and the board will revisit the guidelines in approximately one year to evaluate outcomes and determine whether policy adjustments are needed.
