Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Star Bonds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate Commerce Committee advances SB197 after adopting Star Bond amendments
Summary
The Senate Commerce Committee moved a substitute for Senate Bill 197 favorably for passage after extended debate and several amendments affecting the Star Bond program.
Get email alerts on the Star Bonds topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Commerce Committee moved a substitute for Senate Bill 197 favorably for passage after extended debate over changes to the state's Star Bond program.
Senator Tyson offered amendments that would tighten oversight and shorten the program's sunset. "It would require approval from the finance council for any Star Bond project," Tyson said when explaining one amendment, adding the intent was to make sure the finance council review applied regardless of which statutory path the Secretary of Commerce used. The committee considered several related changes, including time-limited construction authority for small communities and a bonding mechanism through the Kansas Development Finance Authority.
Why it matters: Star Bonds are a state economic-development financing tool designed to incentivize large investments by diverting sales tax generated at a project to pay project debt. Lawmakers argued over whether the program needs more checks and whether added steps would slow or deter projects.
Committee discussion and amendments
Senator Tyson argued for requiring Finance Council approval for Star Bond projects so the finance portion and project approval would both receive that oversight. "It wasn't mandating that they have to go three different times," Tyson said, describing the amendment as ensuring the Finance Council reviews the relevant pieces of any approval path.
Opponents warned extra steps could slow deals or push developers elsewhere. "There is a potential opportunity to stifle...the opportunity with Starbonds," one senator said during debate, adding that speed and investor confidence matter to get projects built. Several senators also noted existing reviews: the Department of Commerce, local governments and private investors already examine proposals before a Star Bond moves forward.
A separate amendment (recorded in the transcript as an amendment presented by Senator Deakman/Dietrich) would allow the Secretary of Commerce to approve vertical construction within an approved Star Bond district in cities with population under 60,000, but only if approval is granted prior to 12/31/2025. The same language included a new Section 2 authorizing, as provided by the Secretary of Commerce, the Kansas Development Finance Authority (KDFA) to issue special-obligation bonds for Star Bond projects; the transcript records a revisor explaining that such bonds "are not to be considered general obligation bonds of the State" and "shall be the obligation only of the Kansas Development Finance Authority."
Senator Tyson later moved an amendment to shorten the Star Bonds sunset to three years (from five). Tyson said the intent was to give the Legislature a chance to revisit the program quickly because the scope of Star Bonds has expanded (for example to include existing buildings and construction equipment). "Why not revisit it in three years? We did that with the railroad tax credit," Tyson said, arguing the committee will be in place to reassess.
Votes and final motion
A motion to reopen one of Senator Tyson's earlier amendments failed on a committee hand vote (recorded in the transcript as failing 6–5). The committee adopted the three-year sunset amendment and the other time-limited, small-community construction language during debate and then took a final procedural step: members voted to pass a substitute bill for SB197 and recommend it favorably for passage as amended. The substitute motion passed; the transcript records "Opposed? Motion carries." (Detailed roll-call tallies beyond the one 6–5 failure were not specified in the transcript.)
What remains unclear from the committee record
The committee discussion raised questions about long-term fiscal effects, the precise scope of KDFA special-obligation bonds and whether the new language changes how risk would be borne if bonds failed. Committee members asked staff and revisers for clarifications; some questions were deferred to floor consideration or to reviser staff for follow-up.
Ending: Senate Bill 197 will move from the Senate Commerce Committee to the next legislative step as a substitute bill reflecting the committee's adopted amendments. Further details, including any floor amendments or final roll-call tallies, will appear in subsequent minutes and the bill text as filed on the floor.

