Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Ordinance Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Commission recommends zoning text amendments to ease egress-window, front-yard parking and street-facing solar rules
Summary
The Grand Rapids City Planning Commission recommended approval Feb. 13 of zoning ordinance text amendments to ease egress-window setbacks, allow administrative departures for replacement of nonconforming front-yard parking, restore a Grand River overlay code section, and reduce barriers to street-facing rooftop solar.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Ordinance Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Grand Rapids City Planning Commission recommended approval Feb. 13 of several zoning ordinance text amendments intended to reduce recurring permitting barriers for homeowners and small businesses.
The package, presented by city planning staff, includes an administrative-departure process to allow egress window wells to be located as close as 1 foot from a side lot line (down from the effective 3-foot requirement that often forces applicants to seek variances), rules allowing replacement of nonconforming front-yard parking through an administrative departure, reinstatement of a Grand River overlay code section that had been omitted in an earlier amendment, and a revision to make it easier to site rooftop solar on street-facing sides of structures.
Staff said the egress-window-well change responds to repeated variance approvals by the Board of Zoning Appeals: window wells are typically about 3 feet deep, but many older lots and narrow side setbacks have made the current reading effectively require 6 feet of clearance. Under the proposed amendment, an administrative departure could be granted only after applicants demonstrate there is no feasible alternative location and that conditions required by building code and the amendment (for example, a clear path to the public way, adequate fall protection adjacent to walking surfaces, and assurances the work will not undermine adjacent foundations) are met. "You still need to meet building code, but we added these [standards] so applicants would understand they are required to meet them," a city planning staff member said during the presentation.
The proposed front-yard parking provision would allow owners to repave and replace nonconforming off-street parking in front yards through an administrative departure, provided there is no practical alternative on the site, landscaping is brought closer to conformity, and the parking is not expanded. Staff said properties with 20 or fewer spaces could generally retain their existing count; in other instances applicants could submit a parking-demand study under Section 5-10-4(a) to justify retaining more spaces. "We want to encourage reinvestment and repaving of parking lots in poor condition," a staff member said.
On the Grand River Overlay District, staff proposed reinstating text inadvertently removed in a prior amendment and shifting control of allowed uses to the underlying base zone district where appropriate. Staff said extensive rezoning around the river and expansion of the City Center zone made the prior overlay language less appropriate. The amendment would restore the deleted building-elements section and apply underlying zone uses where the modification better matches surrounding properties.
Finally, staff proposed easing the process for street-facing rooftop solar panels. The change would reduce the barrier homeowners face when there is no other feasible roof orientation; staff noted they have routinely approved administrative departures for street-facing panels and received public support letters for the change. "We've always approved them; this reduces a barrier to homeowners who want to add solar," a staff member said.
Commissioners discussed the amendments briefly and expressed support, saying the package codifies existing practice and reduces repetitive variance requests. A motion recommending approval was read into the record; commissioners voted by voice and the motion carried with the commission chair recording "aye" votes and no opposition.
The recommendations will be forwarded to the City Commission for final action.

