Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Human Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council votes down one-year lease extension for day-labor site; to revisit with data

2335997 · February 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council rejected a one-year extension of the city day-labor site lease with Frank and Russell Denina. Councilmembers cited service costs, occasional public-safety calls and uncertainty about future need; several members recommended monitoring for six months and revisiting.

Tomball — The City Council on Feb. 17 voted against a proposed one-year lease extension with Frank and Russell Denina for a 3.5-acre parcel off Mechanic Street used as the city's day-labor site; the motion to extend failed.

City staff had proposed a one-year amendment that would cap the city’s annual payment at $7,000 to cover taxes; the 2024 tax total for the parcel was reported at $7,660, meaning the cap would not fully cover taxes. The proposed amendment shortened a previously typical two-year extension to a single year to allow near-term reassessment.

Public-safety staff described occasional incidents at the site but said it is not a major call-for-service location. Detective Bryce Smith of the Tomball Police Department told council the site has seen some drinking and isolated incidents over the past years but “we don't have a lot of calls for service over there.” He said the number of day laborers present on any given day varies by time and demand.

Why council declined the extension: Several council members said they were reluctant to continue paying city resources for a site with uncertain future demand and movable populations. Council members and staff noted the city provides porta‑potties, tables and cleanup responsibilities; police said the site has triggered periodic calls for service. Several members suggested a shorter monitoring period and returning to the council in six months with collected data on usage and calls before considering a new lease.

Next steps: Council members discussed options for monitoring and managing displacement if the lease is not renewed, including outreach to the parcel owner and tracking whether the day-labor population moves to other public locations. The staff motion to approve the one-year extension failed on the vote recorded in the meeting minutes; council indicated they will revisit the topic after a data-driven review period.