Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Home Sharing Renewals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board grants multiple home-sharing renewals with uniform quiet hours and occupancy/parking limits

2335507 · February 6, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Adjustment approved a slate of home-sharing renewals and new special-exception permits, imposing standard quiet hours and vehicle/guest limits across properties and setting terms for renewals in several cases.

The Oklahoma City Board of Adjustment approved multiple home-sharing special exceptions and renewals in one docket, attaching consistent conditions including quiet hours from 9 p.m. to 8 a.m., limits on overnight guests and caps on vehicles; many renewals were for one- to three-year terms.

Board members and staff applied a standard set of conditions to most applications, typically limiting on-street parking during quiet hours and setting maximum guest and vehicle counts tailored to each property’s size and parking availability. Several applications were renewals; others were first-time permits.

Key outcomes for individual cases (motions passed by voice vote unless otherwise noted):

- Case 15835 (2920 SW 6030 Street) — Renewal for K and K Enterprises/Charmaine Hanno: granted with modifications: maximum guests 7, term 3 years, quiet hours 9 p.m.–8 a.m., maximum 3 vehicles, and no on-street parking during quiet hours.

- Case 15836 (3016 SW 601st Street) — Renewal for K and K Enterprises: granted with modifications: maximum guests 9, term 3 years, quiet hours 9 p.m.–8 a.m., maximum 6 vehicles, and no on-street parking during quiet hours.

- Case 15825 (1728 Runway Boulevard) — Howell/Carr (trustees): granted with modifications: quiet hours 9 p.m.–8 a.m., maximum vehicles 4 (2 in garage, 2 on street), term 1 year.

- Case 15821 (1844 NW 23rd St, Unit 15) — Flamingo Holdings LLC: granted with modifications: quiet hours 9 p.m.–8 a.m., maximum vehicles 1 (one designated parking space), term 1 year.

- Case 15823 (2935 NW 19th St) — granted with quiet hours 9 p.m.–8 a.m., 3-car maximum, term 1 year.

- Case 15824 (2201 NW 13th St) — granted with quiet hours 9 p.m.–8 a.m., 4-car maximum, and no on-street parking during quiet hours.

- Case 15826 (1325 SW 14th St) — granted with quiet hours 9 p.m.–8 a.m., 2-car maximum, and no on-street parking during quiet hours.

- Case 15827 (1624 NW 32nd St) — granted with quiet hours 9 p.m.–8 a.m., 3-car maximum, no on-street parking during quiet hours, term 1 year.

- Case 15828 (1704 NW 17th St, Unit 102) — granted with quiet hours 9 p.m.–8 a.m., 2-car maximum, no on-street parking during quiet hours.

- Case 15829 (1704 NW 17th St, Unit 101) — granted with same modifications as Unit 102 (quiet hours and parking restrictions).

- Case 15830 (3804 NW 20th St) — Karen Tarbutton: granted with modifications: maximum guests 6, term 1 year, 3-car maximum, no on-street parking during quiet hours.

- Case 15831 (3821 NW 20th St) — Karen Tarbutton (second property): granted with modifications: maximum guests 4, term 1 year, 4-car maximum, no on-street parking during quiet hours.

- Case 15832 (600 SW 111th St) — Julie Lamb renewal: granted; term extended to 3 years per board action; other conditions per application (quiet hours and vehicle limit) remain in place.

- Case 15834 (833 SE 67th St) — Carlos [applicant surname in packet]: granted with modifications: maximum guests 5, maximum 2 cars, no on-street parking at any time, term 1 year. The board emphasized enforcement and encouraged the applicant to share contact information with neighbors.

Board members said consistent, enforceable conditions (quiet hours, guest caps and parking restrictions) help balance property owners’ rental activity with neighborhood livability. Planning staff reminded applicants that complaints are enforced through code enforcement and that renewals may be reviewed if neighbors report problems.

Several applicants were asked to contact neighbors who had filed written protests and to provide updated contact information to staff. Renewals and new permits will be monitored; the board said it will consider enforcement or denial on future renewal cycles if problems recur.