Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Intersection Control topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission declines all-way stop request at S. Harrah Road and SE 100th/4th Street

2335492 · February 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission denied a petition to install all-way stop control at the rural intersection of S. Harrah Road and SE 100th/4th Street after staff analysis showed it did not meet MUTCD criteria; the decision was discretionary and consistent with traffic volumes and sight conditions.

The Traffic and Transportation Commission disapproved a request to install an all-way stop at S. Harrah Road and SE 100th/4th Street on Feb. 17 after staff said the intersection did not meet stop-warrant criteria.

Commissioner Barnell moved to disapprove the all-way stop application; Commissioner Karnes seconded. The motion carried and the item was disapproved (vote recorded in the minutes as disapproved; specific tallies were not specified on the record).

Traffic Services Division staff reported an entering volume on Harrah Road of 6,476 vehicles per day with a 55 mph posted speed limit, and an entering volume of about 300 vehicles per day on SE 100th/4th Street (the public approach). Staff said two collisions occurred at the intersection between Jan. 2022 and Dec. 2024. When staff ran a warrant analysis using the applicable MUTCD criteria, the location did not meet the criteria for all-way stop control.

Staff noted there were no decision sight-distance limitations or other safety mitigation conditions that required a stop control at this location; however, the division recognized that all-way stops occur at rural section-line intersections in Oklahoma City and that use of an all-way stop here would not violate driver expectation. The commission chose to disapprove the petition at this time.

Commission discussion included a site observation by a commissioner for whom the intersection is in his ward; that commissioner said traffic was moving at speed but that vehicles were able to enter the mainline within 10–15 seconds during a mid-to-late-morning observation, and he supported disapproval.

The commission’s action was discretionary; staff will take no further action unless the applicant requests reconsideration or supplies new evidence.