Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Augusta delays decision on House Bill 581 opt-in/opt-out until special call meeting
Summary
With a March 1 deadline looming, the commission voted to move final action on House Bill 581 (floating homestead tax exemption) to a special-call meeting next week after noting three public hearings and continued state-level activity.
The Augusta Commission voted to defer a final decision on whether the city will opt in or opt out of House Bill 581 (the floating homestead tax exemption) and directed staff to add the item to a special-call meeting next week.
Administrator Allen reminded commissioners the city has until March 1 to make the opt-in/opt-out decision and that Augusta has already held three required public hearings in case the commission chooses to opt out. Commissioners described ongoing state legislative activity (including discussion of House Bill 92) and citizens told the commission some voters may not have fully understood the ballot question in November.
Commissioner Don Clark, who led several of the public outreach sessions, said staff and subject-matter experts had worked to inform the public and that recordings were available for those who missed the sessions. He said the commission should encourage residents to review the recorded sessions before any decision is taken.
Mayor Pro Tempore Wayne Guilfoyle argued for a pause to analyze pros and cons and suggested postponing action until next week; he moved to defer to a special call meeting and a colleague seconded. City attorney counsel and legal staff advised that a special-call meeting is required for any action to opt out next week, and the clerk scheduled the addition to the special-call agenda. The motion to delay and add the item to next week’s special-call agenda carried (the clerk later noted one commissioner was absent at the recorded vote).
Public comments on the item included former Commissioner Moses Todd urging the commission not to “take us away from the voters” and advocating that any opt‑out vote be paired with a simultaneous local vote on revenue measures (a “floss,” as he described it). Staff reiterated that the commission must weigh local fiscal impacts and potential state-level changes before a final decision.
No final opt-in or opt-out decision was recorded at this meeting; the commission scheduled further deliberation at the special-call meeting to ensure commissioners have time to consider additional options and any new state legislation.
