Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environmental Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee advances bill requiring PFAS monitoring for facilities draining to Occoquan/AquaCon watershed
Summary
The Senate committee voted to report House Bill 2,050, which requires quarterly PFAS testing and reporting for permitted industrial dischargers into the Occoquan/AquaCon watershed beginning October 2025; sponsors said the measure aims to identify discharges that could force a multi‑hundred‑million dollar treatment investment by water utilities.
The Senate Finance and Appropriations Committee voted to report House Bill 2,050, which would require facilities discharging industrial waste into the Occoquan/AquaCon watershed to monitor for per‑ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) at least once every three months beginning in October 2025 and to report results to the Department of Environmental Quality.
Sponsors said the measure responds to new Environmental Protection Agency drinking‑water standards for PFAS and to recent test results showing PFAS in treated drinking water drawn from the Occoquan, a primary source for Fairfax Water and other regional systems. A committee presenter said Fairfax Water faces an estimated $385 million capital cost to remove PFAS from its source water if upstream sources are not identified and reduced.
The bill’s sponsor described the measure as a framework to identify industrial PFAS sources and develop mitigation strategies intended to protect ratepayers from large capital costs. A staff presenter summarized bill provisions and the proposed monitoring schedule; committee members asked about scope, which systems are covered and potential fiscal effects.
Senator Deeds moved to report the bill; the motion was seconded and the committee recorded an affirmative vote (ayes 13, no 1) to report the bill out of committee.
Committee members and presenters also said the bill is intended to give utilities and regulators the information needed to pursue targeted reductions in source‑water PFAS rather than forcing immediate, system‑wide treatment projects.
The bill as reported requires quarterly monitoring and reporting by permitted dischargers that send industrial waste under an industrial pretreatment program permit into the sewer collection systems that discharge to the AquaCon Reservoir, AquaCon River or related waterways. The measure sets the monitoring start date but leaves implementation details and any funding requests to the executive branch and the budget process.
If enacted, the committee and sponsors said, the monitoring would underpin future policy and investment choices by identifying which dischargers contribute PFAS to the watershed and by clarifying whether source reductions can avert massive treatment costs for drinking‑water utilities.
Votes at a glance: the committee reported House Bill 2,050 (ayes 13, no 1).
The bill will proceed to further floor action and to budget deliberations for any needed implementation funding.
