Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessments Facilities Class Size topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews midyear assessment data and schedules facilities deep dive; members raise class-size concerns
Summary
Trustees reviewed midyear student assessment data showing growth on I-Ready and Acadience assessments, discussed multi-tiered supports and extended learning, and agreed to a facilities-focused meeting in April. Several board members raised concerns about small cohort sizes in upcoming grades and future staffing implications.
Trustees received a midyear student-assessment update and approved a revised meeting plan that will prioritize a facilities presentation in April.
Central office staff and the curriculum office provided slides showing midyear growth on I-Ready and Acadience assessments. The presenter said most grade levels are showing growth in math and reading and that the majority of students fall into the district’s desired benchmark categories on both assessments. "You can see some really good growth, in both the I Ready and the Acadience," the presenter said, adding that Tier 3 (highest intervention) counts were low in several grades while extended-learning numbers were higher in others.
Curriculum staff member Jill Azier (chief officer for curriculum and instruction and assessment) was referenced in the discussion; the meeting noted Swayze Elementary’s multi-tiered system of supports as an example where interventions and extended-learning placements aligned with student needs.
The board agreed to shift the April agenda to a deeper facilities review that would include a three- to five-year plan and involve facilities staff, because facility needs influence budgeting decisions for the coming fiscal year.
Several board members raised class-size concerns, noting a pattern of small cohort sizes in some grades and a very large junior class in recent history. One trustee said a current fourth-grade class is "really tiny" and observed a kindergarten cohort of about 35 that may not produce the same downstream bumps as in previous years. Trustees discussed options used in other districts such as shifting staff, multi-age classrooms, or reallocating teachers to maintain instructional coverage. The board did not take action on class-size policy at the meeting and flagged the matter for future discussion tied to staffing and budgeting.
No formal votes were recorded on curriculum changes, special education placement policy or class-size limits; the changes to the committee meeting schedule and April facilities presentation were accepted as the board’s plan.
