Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Coroners topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill clarifying coroner duties after testimony; critic urges stronger confidentiality and penalties
Summary
Senate Bill 11-01 would clarify coroners' roles and add basic training expectations. The coroner association supported the change as a first step; a father who lost his daughter urged stronger confidentiality protections and penalties for noncompliance.
Senator Melissa Wintrow, co-chair of the Joint Legislative Oversight Committee (JLOC), presented Senate Bill 11-01 to the Senate Judiciary & Rules Committee as a measure to clarify coroner roles and establish basic duties and training expectations across Idaho's elected coroners.
Tory Danner, coroner for Bannock County and president of the Idaho State Association of County Coroners, told the committee the association drafted the language to address inconsistencies identified in an OPE report and to get coroners "operating on the same sheet of music." He said the bill clarifies when coroners should perform medical-legal death investigations and aims to reduce statewide variation.
Alan Hodges, who testified as a parent (and said he was a registered lobbyist), told the committee the bill did not go far enough. He described finding his 16-year-old daughter after a seizure and said local responders and a deputy coroner treated the scene as a crime scene, seized medication and took photographs. Hodges asked for stronger statutory confidentiality protections for coroner records and for penalties when coroners do not meet statutory training requirements; he said Idaho lacks a confidentiality scheme present in neighboring states.
Danner replied that this bill is a tiered approach and that additional legislation is being prepared to address the confidentiality and penalty issues Hodges raised.
Senator Foreman moved to send SB 11-01 to the floor with a due pass recommendation; Senator Lent seconded. The committee approved the motion by voice vote.
Ending: Supporters said the bill is a foundational step to bring consistency to death investigations; advocates for victims' families urged further measures on confidentiality and enforcement that members promised to pursue in subsequent legislation.
