Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Budget topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents criticize recent board budget cuts and warn reductions could prompt families to leave
Summary
Multiple residents told the Stratham School Board they were alarmed by recent cuts to the proposed operating budget and questioned the board’s process and priorities. One family said it may consider withdrawing its child if the board limits administration authority.
Several Stratham residents used the meeting’s public comment period to criticize the board’s recent budget actions and to voice concern about the district’s direction if proposed cuts stand.
Patrick Quinn, of Lamington Place, criticized what he called selective public data displays posted on a local forum and warned the board’s budget actions are creating “the appearance of failure where there is none.” Quinn said the board voted at the previous meeting to cut about $111,000 from the operating budget and that the reduction would remove one teacher if the town approves the revised budget. “If that budget passes next month, we can all go down to the 110 grill. You'd be able to get 2 cocktails for the price of that teacher,” Quinn said.
Cameron North, a resident who also previously worked on the FACT committee that reviewed the budget, said he and other volunteers spent weeks analyzing the budget only to see the board reduce spending in a matter of minutes. “It was disappointing that a month or a month and a half of analysis got boiled down to a decision that was made in 2 or 3 minutes,” North said.
Andrea Helfenzarumba, who said she and her husband might consider removing their daughter from the district because of the board’s actions, told trustees she supported administrators and teachers but could not “leave her education in your hands” if the board restricts administration authority. She said the decision to possibly leave was prompted by what she described as board members “serving their own self interests.”
The comments came after a board discussion and a prior vote referenced by speakers; the speakers characterized that vote as a narrow majority that reduced the proposed operating budget. Board members acknowledged public concern and the volume of emails they had received about budget matters, and multiple trustees said outreach and meetings about the upcoming March 4 vote on several warrant articles, including a building bond, were ongoing.
Ending: The board left public comment open for additional speakers and noted outreach events and voter information materials will continue before the March 4 vote on the budget and the bond.
