Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Votes Roundup topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances cosmetology, commerce background checks, tables adult-care bill; multiple measures pass or carry to other committees
Summary
The Committee on Commerce, Labor and Economic Development on Friday approved technical changes to a cosmetology bill, advanced a Commerce background-check bill, tabled an adult-care homes measure for further study and left a workforce/IDD bill in committee pending appropriations review.
The House Committee on Commerce, Labor and Economic Development on Friday took several procedural and substantive actions across multiple bills.
House Bill 23‑38, a cosmetology cleanup measure that replaces demonstration permits with temporary location and temporary guest body-artist permits for the Kansas State Board of Cosmetology, was moved out of committee with technical changes and a favorable recommendation. Vice Chair Turk moved the bill and Representative Penn seconded; the motion passed by voice vote.
House Bill 23‑42, a bill enabling the Secretary of Commerce to conduct criminal-history background checks on final applicants and employees in defined sensitive positions, was passed out of committee favorably on a voice vote after a motion by Vice Chair Turk and a second by Representative Penn.
House Bill 23‑39, a multifaceted bill addressing adult care homes, drew extended discussion about potential fiscal impacts and unfunded mandates. Representative Williams moved to table the measure for further review, Representative Wasinger seconded, and the committee voted to table the bill. Committee members described multiple provisions, including authority for the Secretary of Health and Environment to administer grants to enable adult care homes to provide childcare services, the creation of a fund and grant program, scholarships for part‑time nursing students and minimum education standards for nursing instructors. Members expressed concern that the bill may create new obligations without identified funding.
Committee members also discussed a large workforce/IDD waiver bill (House Bill 23‑10 in committee discussion) that committee leaders said appeared likely to carry a substantial fiscal note (committee members cited an estimated $50–$80 million per year). Committee leadership said their intent was to keep that bill in committee so it remains intact, then seek to move it to Appropriations for fuller review and hearings.
Why it matters: Several items were technical or housekeeping in nature, but the adult-care homes bill and the workforce/IDD discussion raised fiscal and implementation concerns that committee members said need further scrutiny before advancing.
Votes and formal actions are summarized in the actions field below.
