Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Landbank topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters press council on land bank, homeownership, solar takings and local hiring
Summary
During general public comment the committee heard multiple callers pressing the council on housing, land bank ownership, tax foreclosures, community representation on NACs, solar takings and local hiring/training. Several callers urged council to prioritize homeowners and seniors; two students offered brief remarks in favor of civic engagement.
Detroit residents who called or attended the Committee of the Whole raised recurring themes about housing, the land bank, community representation and development policy during the committee’s public‑comment period.
Multiple callers pressed the council on land bank ownership and the disposition of proceeds from DLBA sales. One speaker asked whether proceeds from property sales (listed on the agenda at $14,000, $4,500 and $15,000) would be remitted to the city’s general fund or another account, and asked for clarification about how the land bank acquires and holds foreclosed properties. Other callers described a loss of Detroit homeownership after tax foreclosures and demanded accountability for what they called mismanagement and large transfers of property out of neighborhood ownership.
Several callers asked that Neighborhood Advisory Council (NAC) representatives be chosen by community election rather than appointment, arguing that residents should select people who negotiate community benefits for taxpayer dollars. Callers repeatedly urged the council to prioritize homeowners and seniors when distributing funds and services. The Virginia Park Community Coalition raised concerns about the Herman Kiefer project and asked whether NACs were involved in current meetings for that site; the speaker asked for better oversight of nonprofit contractors hired to rehab homes.
Other topics raised in public comment included:
- Criticism of perceived “gentrification” and demands that community benefit processes be more democratic and resident‑driven; one commenter said the city has lost hundreds of thousands of homes in prior years due to tax foreclosure processes. - Concerns about solar projects and a claim that proposed “solar takings” are illegal; a caller referenced an agenda line that they said proposed paying $205,000 for 8078 East Robinwood and said the parcel had not been voted into a taking area. - Calls for the council to support local hiring, to give preference to Detroit contractors on city contracts and to create training partnerships so local students can fill future jobs created by development.
The committee limited the general public comment time that day to 1 minute 30 seconds because of volume. Committee members acknowledged callers’ concerns and several council members and staff encouraged callers to follow up with their council offices or file written comments for the record. Two students from Durfee Elementary testified briefly in support of civic engagement and were thanked by council members.
No formal council action resulted directly from the public‑comment period; many callers requested further city action or answers to questions and council staff committed to follow up where appropriate.
