Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House Education Committee advances package of bills on remote testing, special education, financial literacy, teacher training and student safety

2323765 · February 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Washington House Education Committee met in executive session and advanced a package of bills on remote testing for online students, special education age limits, financial education graduation requirements, dual-credit administration, school satisfaction surveys, teacher residency programs, limits on isolation and restraint, and institutional education governance for justice-involved students.

OLYMPIA — The Washington House Education Committee met in executive session and advanced a package of education bills Tuesday, voting to report multiple proposed substitutes and amended bills out of committee with due-pass recommendations.

The bills span several topics: allowing online students to take statewide standardized tests remotely (House Bill 1079); extending the provision of special education services through the school year a student turns 22 (House Bill 1257); creating pilot programs and data work for CTE dual-credit pathways (House Bill 1273, proposed substitute H-1427.1); a financial-education high school graduation requirement (House Bill 1285); a voluntary statewide parent/guardian survey about public school satisfaction and disenrollment reasons (House Bill 1289); teacher residency and apprenticeship program rules (House Bill 1651); restrictions and reporting requirements on student isolation and restraint (House Bill 1795); and directing the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction to plan for institutional education responsibilities for justice-involved students (House Bill 1827).

The committee approved amendments on many bills before moving them forward. Representative Ortiz Self, sponsor of HB 1079, urged the committee to approve the amendment extending implementation and said the bill allows students who take online coursework "to take those online the state test online without having to leave their home in the area in which they've been taking all their coursework." Representative Pollet, sponsor of HB 1257, said the bill ensures "students who are entitled to special education services until age 22" receive services through the full school year in which they turn 22, noting the change aligns state practice with federal law.

Committee staff briefed bills in turn. Damien Morton Snipper, public affairs intern for the Office of Program Research, summarized HB 1079 and described an amendment (Moore 005) that shifts the start year for remote testing from the 2026–27 school year to 2027–28 and moves the OSPI policy deadline from April 1, 2026, to April 1, 2027. Megan (staff) and Ethan (staff) briefed multiple other bills and amendments, including details on proposed substitutes and the scope of required reports and data disaggregation for HB 1289.

Several bills included notable policy clarifications or fiscal considerations during discussion. For HB 1285, Representative Rood offered several amendments to delay report deadlines, grandfather in districts that already meet the standard to reduce fiscal impact, require the State Board of Education to use existing funds for certain Charter School Commission duties and to perform consultations concurrently with other SBE graduation work. Representative Ortiz Self voiced concern that implementation could create an "unfunded mandate" if other SBE work and credit-counting changes are not aligned before the requirement takes effect.

Teacher residency and apprenticeship legislation (HB 1651) drew discussion about limiting program approvals to shortage areas, service-obligation repayment terms for residents who do not fulfill commitments and allowing charter schools and state tribal education compact schools to participate. An amendment proposing to limit PESB approval to shortage areas failed on a voice vote; the proposed substitute with other changes passed out of committee.

HB 1795, the demonstration and policy package to reduce student isolation and restraints, drew the longest debate. Sponsor Representative Kalen and other supporters said the bill is aimed at "creating the conditions for children to thrive" by restricting chemical and mechanical restraint, tightening reporting and incident-review requirements, and establishing state compliance monitoring and training. Several members expressed concerns about mandates on districts and operational details (for example, continuous visual contact requirements and resource implications). The bill passed the committee by roll call 12–6 with one excused member.

The committee generally moved bills by voice vote when support was unanimous or near-unanimous; where recorded roll calls were requested, the clerk announced tallies on the record. Final committee tallies included: HB 1079 (19–0), HB 1257 (19–0), HB 1273 proposed substitute (19–0), HB 1285 proposed substitute (18–0 with 1 excused), HB 1289 proposed substitute (18–0 with 1 excused), HB 1651 proposed substitute (16–2 with 1 excused), HB 1795 (12–6 with 1 excused), HB 1827 proposed substitute (18–0 with 1 excused).

Votes at a glance

- House Bill 1079 (remote testing for online students): Motion to report substitute with due-pass recommendation adopted; amendment Moore 005 (sponsored by Representative Ortiz Self) adopted to shift implementation window and OSPI policy deadline; final committee vote 19 ayes, 0 nays.

- House Bill 1257 (special education through school year student turns 22): Amendment WARG 129 (Representative Pollet) adopted to state legislative intent that the extension not supplant other eligible services; final vote 19–0.

- House Bill 1273 (proposed substitute H-1427.1 — CTE dual credit pilots/administration): Proposed substitute adopted as reported; final vote 19–0.

- House Bill 1285 (financial education graduation requirement, proposed substitute): Multiple cost-saving amendments adopted (H1464.1, H1465.1, H1467.1, H1466.1) including delaying some reporting deadlines and requiring some actions to be within existing resources; final vote 18–0, 1 excused.

- House Bill 1289 (WSIPC parent/guardian satisfaction survey, proposed substitute H-132.1): Committee adopted amendments to expand respondents, add disaggregation requirements, and require ESDs and OSPI collaboration for public summaries; final vote 18–0, 1 excused.

- House Bill 1651 (teacher residency and apprenticeship): Proposed substitute reported out with amendments; one amendment to restrict approvals to shortage areas failed on the floor; final committee vote 16–2, 1 excused.

- House Bill 1795 (restrictions on isolation and restraint; demonstration projects): Extensive debate; bill reported out of committee with due-pass recommendation; final vote 12–6, 1 excused.

- House Bill 1827 (OSPI role in institutional education for justice-involved students, proposed substitute): Amendment MOET 379 adopted to require educator input and to align timelines; final committee vote 18–0, 1 excused.

What the committee did not act on

The committee announced at the start of the session that House Bill 1634 would not be taken up that day and expected it on a later agenda.

Context and next steps

Bills reported out of committee carry a due-pass recommendation to the full House for further consideration, and amendments adopted in committee (including changes to deadlines, implementation windows and reporting responsibilities) will be part of the committee-reported text. Several measures were described as "subject to appropriations," meaning final implementation depends on future budget action. The committee also noted a process deadline for amendments filed for the next executive session.

Ending note

Committee members repeatedly emphasized follow-up work and refinements on several bills during floor consideration; in multiple cases members said they expect to continue negotiations on technical details and implementation timelines as the bills move to the next stage of the legislative process.