Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Committee hears continuation of $25 monthly insulin cap for PERS members; fiscal impact estimated small

February 17, 2025 | 2025 Legislature NC, North Carolina


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Committee hears continuation of $25 monthly insulin cap for PERS members; fiscal impact estimated small
Lawmakers reviewed a proposal to continue a $25 monthly cap on insulin and related diabetic supplies for members of the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) health plan.

Senator Cleary, the bill sponsor in committee, said the provision mirrors a commercial bill in the House but the committee amendment limits the mandate to the PERS plan. Rebecca Fricke of the Public Employees Retirement System testified about the pilot program PERS ran during the current biennium and the actuarial estimate for continuing the cap.

Fricke said the pilot (January–June 2024 data) showed the plan experienced a modest increase in plan costs while directly reducing out‑of‑pocket spending for insulin users. Deloitte, PERS’ independent actuary, priced continuation of the program for the next biennium at an estimated 0.12% increase in premiums, which Fricke said equates to about $2.07 per contract per month. The fiscal note breaks that total into the share for state general funds, special funds and political subdivisions that participate in the plan.

Committee members asked whether the cap applied to Medicare Part D beneficiaries and Fricke clarified the federal Inflation Reduction Act already imposes a $35 monthly cap in Medicare Part D; the PERS proposal excludes Medicare retirees for that reason.

Discussion noted manufacturers had lowered some insulin list prices during the pilot, which reduced the projected cost pressure, and members raised policy questions about whether the state should extend a similar cap to the commercial market rather than only continue it for PERS.

The committee did not take a final vote on SB 2370; members set the bill aside pending further consideration and to wait for a committee member to return.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep North Carolina articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI