Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate panel refers flag-display measure to amending order after debate over definitions and local control
Summary
The Senate Education Committee voted to send House Bill 41 to the amending order after debate over definitions of "flag" and "banner," scope (classroom vs. parking lots), and concerns from educators and civil-rights groups about vagueness and free‑speech implications.
Get email alerts on the Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Education Committee on an undisclosed February date referred House Bill 41 to the amending order after extended debate and public testimony. The bill, sponsored by Representative Ted Hill, would require classrooms to display the American flag and the state flag as the primary classroom flags and prohibit "political, ideological, and religious" flags or banners in public elementary and secondary school classrooms. The committee substituted referral to the amending order to add definitions and clarify scope.
Representative Ted Hill told the committee he introduced the bill to "reinstill" patriotism in schools and to limit what he called divisive displays. "This is about banners and flags. It doesn't apply to pins," Hill said in response to questions about personal items and classroom displays.
Several senators expressed concern about vague language and local control. Senator Woodward suggested adding a definition of "display" to distinguish temporary instructional materials from permanently affixed flags. Senator Ward Engelking and others asked whether the measure would prohibit educational reenactments, club banners, or historical displays and said some issues are better handled by local school boards.
Three in-person testifiers spoke during public comment. Cassie Horner, a Boise School District educator, testified in opposition, warning the bill "would significantly harm the values of representation, inclusion, and free expression" and that the measure could confuse teachers because key terms were not defined. Grace Howitt of the Idaho Family Policy Center testified in support, arguing the bill would promote patriotism and unity. Jenna Damron of the ACLU of Idaho testified in opposition, saying HB 41 "would create an unconstitutional content-specific ban on speech in public schools" and that terms such as "school property," "banner," and "classroom" are undefined and could chill speech.
During committee floor discussion, Senator Zito moved to send House Bill 41 to the floor with a due-pass recommendation; later Senator Ward Engelking made a substitute motion to send the bill to the amending order. The committee approved the substitute motion and directed staff to work on definitions for "display," "flag," "banner," and "school property."
The sponsor said he would be amenable to adding definitions and working with committee members. The committee's referral to the amending order means the bill will be revised before returning for further committee or floor action.
