Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections Foreign Influence topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House bans foreign nationals from financing campaigns for or against state constitutional amendments
Summary
HB 2106 passed the Kansas House after extended debate. The bill bars foreign nationals and certain foreign-controlled entities from contributing to campaigns supporting or opposing proposed state constitutional amendments, with a disclosure requirement for groups that received foreign funds over a $100,000 four‑year threshold.
The Kansas House on Feb. 14 passed HB 2106, a bill that bans contributions from foreign nationals, foreign governments, and certain foreign entities to campaigns for or against proposed amendments to the Kansas Constitution. The final recorded vote was 94 in favor and 25 opposed.
Representative Proctor, the bill's sponsor, framed the bill as closing a gap in existing law. He cited the 2022 campaign over a constitutional amendment in which, he said, "the groups that were campaigning for a no vote on the value in both amendment received $1,600,000 from foreign nationals in support of that..." and said the bill requires organizations spending on such ballot questions to disclose and certify the absence of foreign donations above a $100,000 threshold in the previous four years.
Opponents raised concerns about the bill's definitions and implementation. Representative Haskins said the term "indirect" — used in the bill text — was not well defined and warned the proposal risked being "one-sided" and insufficiently detailed. Representative Simmons criticized the $100,000 permissible cutoff, saying "this bill still allows up to $100,000 every 4 years." Representative Susan Ruiz questioned how the policy would affect people with Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) status; floor discussion established that federal law already bars foreign nationals from contributing to candidate campaigns and that this bill targets contributions related to constitutional amendment campaigns.
Representative Proctor said the number was chosen because a similar Ohio statute had withstood court challenges and argued lawmakers could tighten the limit later if needed. Members also debated whether the bill would capture foreign corporations and other entities; the bill's sponsor said the bill covers individuals who are not citizens or lawful permanent residents, foreign governments or political parties, and entities organized under the laws of or with principal places of business in a foreign country.
After floor debate and a failed motion to send the bill back to committee, the House voted to report the bill favorably and recorded final passage at 94–25. The bill moves next to the Senate.
