Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee waives paving requirement for single-lot plat on Glenside Drive after drainage assurances
Summary
After public comment and staff briefing, the Rapid City Public Works Committee voted to waive the requirement to pave the section of Glenside Drive tied to a proposed one-lot subdivision, directing staff to require a drainage report and on-site detention in the platting process.
The Rapid City Public Works Committee voted Feb. 11 to waive the city's usual requirement to pave a short stretch of Glenside Drive tied to a proposed one-lot preliminary subdivision.
The committee's decision follows public comment from property owners and a staff briefing that framed the request as a narrow, site-specific exception rather than a change to paving policy. Residents told the committee the area has longstanding gravel roads and drainage problems dating back decades; one speaker said the neighborhood's roads have "a lot of dust" and called the request a small, reasonable accommodation.
Planning staff described the technical requirements connected to approval: if the lot is platted, the applicant must provide a drainage report and design ditching or storm infrastructure sized to handle additional runoff. Staff said the pavement requirement would be limited to the frontage of the lot being platted — about 200 feet south of Homestead Street — but noted the area lacks adequate ditches and has historically been in county jurisdiction.
Vicky (planning staff) told the committee the preliminary subdivision filing triggered additional items that would be documented in a staff report to the City Council, including potential right-of-way dedication and possible variances tied to front-yard setbacks if right-of-way changes occur. She also flagged the "40-unit" rule: the neighborhood totals more than 40 dwelling units with a single point of access, and only the City Council can consider an exception to that standard.
The applicant's engineer said the plan will include on-site detention so the developed lot releases no more runoff than current conditions. After discussion, the committee moved and approved a motion to waive the paving requirement for this one-lot preliminary plat; the staff recommendation had been to deny the appeal. Committee members who spoke said the area is "exceptionally unique" and that paving a short segment could create additional drainage problems if not paired with proper drainage design.
The waiver does not remove the requirement that a drainage report be submitted and does not decide any City Council-level exceptions (including the 40-unit single-access exception). Staff will prepare a full report and bring the plat and any related variances to the City Council for final decisions.
