Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Seneca branch ADA ramp project bid far above estimate; procurement steps next after county postpones funding
Summary
The Seneca branch ADA access project drew one contractor bid of about $132,000 — far above an earlier county engineering estimate of roughly $57,000 — and the bid expired after county council postponed the funding’s second reading, the library director said Jan. 28.
The Oconee County Library’s planned Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) access improvements at the Seneca branch drew a single contractor bid of roughly $132,000, library staff told the board on Jan. 28 — more than double an earlier engineering estimate of about $57,000.
Director Blair Henson summarized the project and its history for board members who had not followed it: the building dates to 1968 with a renovation in the 1980s, the existing public entrance does not meet ADA standards and the only accessible route for patrons with disabilities is a rear ramp and door that requires staff assistance. Engineers proposed a front-entry solution that reconfigures parking, relocates two handicapped spaces to the front, and constructs ramps and new steps to reach electric exterior doors.
Henson said the county retained an engineering estimate for the scope that came in at roughly $57,000. The public procurement process produced one bid at about $132,000, she said, adding that the contractor’s bid expired after county council postponed second reading of the appropriation/ordinance tied to the work. Henson said she will consult procurement staff to determine whether the bidder might honor the price or whether the library should rebid the job.
Board members asked whether a less expensive fix using the rear ramp or reconfiguring the back entrance would be possible; Henson said staff had explored rear-ramp options but concluded the back route lacks line-of-sight and presents staff security concerns unless the county installed cameras or made other structural changes — which could raise costs substantially and approach the price of renovating the front entrance.
Henson noted the project also includes leveling part of the parking area (ADA requires accessible parking surfaces), new concrete work and new steps; she said those elements help explain the higher bid relative to a simple residential-style ramp. She also said some council members have emphasized the preference for a new Seneca library rather than incremental repairs; former Councilman Julian Davis was quoted as having said county funds might be better spent on a new building. Henson said the immediate next step is to consult county procurement to learn whether bids can be reopened or extended and then return to county council for any needed supplemental appropriation.
No formal board vote to change scope or funding of the project was recorded at the meeting. The director characterized the project as necessary for patron safety and equal access and asked the board to note that the project’s current cost exceeds earlier estimates and will require county-level budget action to move forward.
