Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners raise enforcement, permitting questions after reports of nonconforming commercial activity in Vernon limits
Summary
Commissioners discussed recurring complaints about nonconforming commercial uses and code enforcement; the board asked the county administrator and county attorney to clarify jurisdictional responsibilities (county vs. municipal) and to bring the building official and municipal attorney into a future meeting to resolve specific cases.
Multiple commissioners raised concerns about apparent nonconforming commercial activity in properties that county staff and municipal officials have previously reviewed. The conversation centered on a pole‑barn/assembly use and other examples where residents say a structure or business is operating without the commercial permits that would normally be required.
Commissioners and staff discussed the limits of county jurisdiction versus municipal code enforcement. County Administrator and county attorney said the distinction depends on whether a property is inside municipal limits. For properties inside a municipal boundary, the municipality enforces its zoning and building code; for unincorporated properties, county code and building officials enforce county standards. Commissioners asked the county attorney and building official to come to a future meeting with documentation and legal options for enforcement, including whether the county can seek injunctive relief or file liens for cleanup work in some cases.
Commissioners asked staff to gather a clear timeline and documentation about the most prominent example (a commercial operation in Vernon) and to invite the City of Vernon’s attorney and the county building official to the next meeting to explain permitting history and outstanding enforcement steps. The board agreed staff should follow up and return with a recommendation.
