Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Committee votes: summary of resolutions approved Feb. 6

2321798 · February 6, 2025

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee approved multiple resolutions on Feb. 6, including the warming center policy, contract and capital amendments, grant acceptance, and intercounty transit funding. Several items carried brief discussion; all listed resolutions were approved by voice vote in committee.

The Ulster County committee voted on multiple resolutions during its Feb. 6 meeting. Below is a concise summary of each item recorded in the meeting and the committee outcome. Where discussion occurred, a brief note follows.

- Resolution 16 — Establish policy requiring warming center facilities be established and upgraded in southern Ulster County (as amended to require facilities in both the southeastern and southwestern regions and Wawarsing): Approved (see full article on warming centers for details).

- Resolution 17 — Amend 2025 Ulster County budget to accept rental assistance funds from the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance for the Shelter Assistance/Eviction Prevention (SAEF) program: Motion to adopt; approved by committee (discussion minimal).

- Resolution 18 — Approve contract amendment adding $100,000 to the County’s contract with Family of Woodstock Inc. (Department of Social Services) to operate shelter services (requested to cover invoiced services; raises contract from $2,400,000 to $2,500,000): Approved; committee requested county counsel and DSS review contract language on prior authorization for overages.

- Resolution 19 — Amend 2025–2030 Capital Improvement Program and operating/capital budgets; additional $564,597 for Golden Hill transportation improvements (DPW Buildings and Grounds): Motion and discussion on construction inspection and contingency funding; approved by committee.

- Resolution 20 — Approve execution of a contract amendment for $459,579 with Jewry Excavation Inc. (Department of Public Works) for Golden Hill project (contract amount described in meeting materials): Approved by committee.

- Resolution 21 — Approve $20,000 contract with Golden Hill Owner LLC (planning department) — memorializes developer reimbursement commitment for signal costs related to Golden Hill/Route 32: Approved by committee; staff explained developer Penrose committed at least $300,000 and could contribute up to $500,000 if federal funds come through.

- Resolution 22 — Approve contract for $679,100 with Penrose New York Developer LLC (planning department) as subrecipient of congressional-directed funding for water-supply improvements tied to the Golden Hill project: Approved by committee; staff noted payment to developer depends on federal funds materializing.

- Resolution 23 — Authorize execution of contract with New York State Housing Trust Fund Corporation / Office of Community Renewal for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for a housing rehabilitation program; title amended in discussion to correct from “homeownership” to “housing rehabilitation”: Approved by committee.

- Resolution 24 — Authorize execution of contract with the New York State Housing Trust Fund Corporation / Office of Community Renewal for CDBG infrastructure planning grant (mobile home park water-supply planning); amends 2025 budget for planning work: Approved by committee; staff said two mobile home parks will participate in preliminary engineering work.

- Resolution 39 — Authorize Ulster County to accept New York State DOT funds for UCAT intercounty public transit (Kingston–Poughkeepsie and Ulster–Poughkeepsie links): Approved by committee; deputy director explained NYSDOT reimburses for intercounty service costs including wages, maintenance and fuel.

All items listed above were approved by committee voice vote during the Feb. 6 meeting. Several items that required discussion (notably Resolutions 16 and 18) resulted in follow-up direction to county staff for further work or proposed contract revisions.