Get email alerts on the Committee Rules Witnesses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee rejects Markey motion to restore equal private‑witness practice; rules reported favorably
Summary
Ranking Member Markey proposed an amendment to preserve an equal private‑witness practice in the committee’s rules; the amendment failed by roll call 9–10.
Get email alerts on the Committee Rules Witnesses topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Ranking Member Markey proposed an amendment to the committee’s rules to preserve a longstanding practice of calling an equal number of private witnesses for majority and minority in committee hearings.
Markey argued that, except for one Congress, the committee had largely followed the equal‑witness practice since 2001 and said equal witnesses make hearings fairer and “more constructive.” He urged the committee to adopt his amendment to continue that practice.
The chair opposed the amendment, saying the proposed change conformed committee practice to standing Senate rules while offering to work with the minority on witness numbers. Senators Shaheen, Rosen and others spoke in opposition to changing the longstanding bipartisan witness practice.
The committee conducted a roll‑call vote on the Markey amendment; the clerk reported 9 yeas and 10 nays and the amendment failed. The committee later voted to report the committee rules favorably; the chair ruled the rules were reported favorably with a quorum present.
Members discussed accommodating witness numbers in practice and the chair said she would be "absolutely willing to work with our minority" on witness lists for individual hearings. The transcript recorded requests to seek consistent language in the official record and offers to continue dialogue about daily witness counts going forward.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
