The Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners voted to approve a professional services contract requested by the county sheriff's office to secure legislative services, passing the motion with one abstention.

Commissioners heard a presentation that the contract would provide legislative representation tailored to the specific needs of larger counties such as Oklahoma County and Tulsa County and that Tulsa County has used similar arrangements. The board debated whether paying for outside legislative services raised legal questions about political subdivisions using taxpayer dollars and whether the expenditure could be treated as a single-source item.

County staff described the arrangement as a professional services contract paid from a service-fee account and noted the contract contains a standard 30-day termination clause. Mr. Compton provided the encumbrance paperwork in support of processing. Board discussion referenced Terry Simonson and practices in Tulsa County as precedent for structuring legislative services.

One commissioner disclosed a personal relationship with the proposed consultant and announced an abstention from the vote; another commissioner explicitly said the abstention was not a reflection of the consultant's competence. After a motion, a second and discussion about funding source and the 30-day termination provision, the board voted in favor with one abstention and the motion passed.

The board did not identify a statute or ordinance that authorizes or limits this specific contract during the recorded discussion; commissioners asked for clarification on whether the expenditure could be charged to the service-fee account rather than general ad valorem revenue.