Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate committee backs mandate to reintroduce cursive instruction in early grades despite calls for local control
Summary
The committee approved a substitute combining two bills to require cursive instruction for elementary students; proponents argued for cognitive and cultural benefits, while principals and school boards urged that curricula remain a local decision.
Senator Jim McKnight led a measure to require cursive handwriting instruction in elementary grades (a proposed committee substitute combining S-1783 and S-2712). The committee released the substitute after witnesses debated whether the topic should be mandated by statute.
Proponents said cursive supports fine motor skills, memory and cultural literacy. "Writing by hand activates different parts of the brain," McKnight said, and cited the trend of other states reintroducing cursive ("As of 2024, there are 24 states that have added cursive writing back into the curriculum"). He described cursive as a practical skill used for signatures on important documents.
Education organizations — including the New Jersey Principals and Supervisors Association, the New Jersey School Boards Association and the NJEA — told the committee they value cursive but argued the decision should be left to local districts. Jenny Lamont (NJPSA) said many districts already teach cursive in ways that fit their schedules and noted the state standards process provides a periodic, public review of curriculum.
Some witnesses raised equity and retention concerns: Betsy Ginsberg (Garden State Coalition of Schools) pointed out that students can lose skills if they are not practiced beyond early grades. Opponents urged flexibility so districts can balance limited instructional time against other priorities.
Why it matters: The change would reinsert a formerly common skill into statewide expectations and would create a statutory expectation for early-grade handwriting instruction. Proponents framed it as both a literacy and life-skill issue; opponents urged local flexibility and cautioned against additional statewide mandates.
Committee action: The committee voted to release the proposed committee substitute for S-1783 and S-2712. Roll-call recorded affirmative votes from a majority of members; the substitute now moves to the budget committee and the Assembly.
