Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health Vaccine Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House panel backs bill banning employer mandates for emergency-use medical products
Summary
The Health and Human Services Committee gave House Bill 2012 a due-pass recommendation after debate over whether federal law already bars mandates for emergency-use products and public testimony opposing the measure.
The Arizona House Health and Human Services Committee recommended House Bill 2012 for a due-pass report after debate over whether employers may require emergency-use products as a condition of employment.
The bill prohibits an employer, health care entity or government entity from requiring the administration of a product that is authorized for emergency use under federal law — defined in the bill by reference to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act — as a condition of employment.
Sponsor Representative Cooper said the measure would make state statute reflect the federal rule that emergency-use products cannot be mandated and would apply that clarification across employers and health-care settings. “Only fully FDA-approved products can be mandated,” Cooper said in explanation of the bill’s purpose.
Opponents and some committee members said the bill could limit public health tools in future emergencies. Ashley Chambers, executive director of Arizona Families for Vaccines, testified in respectful opposition and read a pediatrician’s statement that urged continued recognition of emergency-use vaccines as an important tool. “As a pediatrician who is on the front lines of the pandemic, I urge you to continue to recognize and support the importance of emergency use authorization vaccines,” Chambers said.
Committee debate included legal history and implementation issues raised by COVID-era vaccine policy. Representative Cooper described the federal emergency-use framework and said the bill simply codifies in state law that emergency-use products may be offered but not mandated. Committee members asked whether the bill applies to state employees and to schools; staff and testifiers said it would apply broadly to employers and health-care entities but would not prevent offering an emergency-use product.
The committee approved the bill on a roll call vote: 7 ayes, 5 nays. The committee record shows Representative Cooper moved the due-pass recommendation and the secretary called the roll.
