Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Discipline Technology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates school‑day cell phone limits; members split on blanket bans vs teacher discretion
Summary
A board member asked whether the district should change its current policy of leaving classroom phone use to teacher discretion; parents, teachers and administrators raised concerns about socialization, safety and enforcement.
A discussion about whether Franklin Regional should revise its cell‑phone policy drew a broad board conversation on Feb. 10 about teacher authority, parental choice and enforcement practicality.
Board member Mrs. Deb Bucero introduced the topic, asking members to consider whether the district should require phones be put away during the school day. “Our policy, I believe, is to let the teachers decide how they wanna handle cell phones in their classrooms,” Bucero said. She cited research that phones at lunch and between classes can reduce socializing and increase social isolation for some students.
Several board members and the superintendent described the district’s current practice: apps and devices are used for practical tasks (for example, e‑hall passes and student medical monitoring), and teachers in classrooms have authority to manage phones. Superintendent Dr. Anthony Peraino said some teachers embrace phone use and others prefer restriction; he suggested the district could take an “internal pulse” of teachers if the board wanted more information.
Parents at the meeting and several board members said a survey might capture teacher and parent sentiment, but one board member noted a prior teacher/parent survey effort had been voted down in a separate meeting. Board members also raised enforcement concerns: districts that lock phones have seen students substitute “burner” devices, and any blanket ban must consider equity, medical exceptions and practicality.
Several board members favored preserving teacher control but asked administrators to gather more objective feedback. “If it is disrupting their learning environment, the teacher already has that ability to do that,” said one member. Another member argued for a clear, uniform classroom expectation—no phones during instruction—to remove inconsistent teacher‑level rules.
No policy change was adopted. Board members asked administration to bring more information back to the policy committee and to collect input from teachers and parents before any districtwide directive is considered.
