Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
KCSD board tables bills-for-payment after member raises concern about issued check; executive-session planned
Summary
Trustees postponed approval of bills for payment at the Feb. 13 meeting after a board member said a check issued to him lacked required itemized documentation; the board agreed the matter involves personnel and will address it in executive session and by potentially calling a special meeting.
The Keystone Central School District board on Feb. 13 tabled the agenda item to approve bills for payment after a public board member raised a dispute about a check issued in his name and questioned whether proper procedures and district policies were followed.
Why it matters: the motion to approve the bills (agenda item J1) was delayed after the board debated whether a check that had been issued and later voided had been processed without the itemized, verified documentation required by district policies and state law. Board members said personnel procedures and due-process protections mean the matter must be handled in executive session.
Board member Chris (full name not stated in the public transcript) said he believed the check’s issuance "felt like a setup" and said he could have unknowingly violated district policy by cashing it. He cited district travel/expense rules, naming policies 616 and 6261, and read aloud what he described as a state-law requirement that such expenses be paid only upon presentation of an itemized verified statement.
President Roger and other board members responded that because the issue now involves potential personnel matters and an ongoing internal investigation, it should not be discussed further in open session. A board speaker said: "If we're gonna discuss any wrongdoing by an employee it's going to happen in an executive session; it will not happen in the public session." The board agreed to place the matter on the next executive-session agenda with counsel to review due process and accountability questions.
Action taken: A motion to approve the bills as presented was made and seconded, but after extended discussion a motion to table J1 passed on a roll-call vote. Several trustees asked for the disputed check to be stricken from the bills report before approval or for a special meeting if immediate payment processing were required. District staff stated the check in question had been voided and explained the paper trail would reflect the void.
Board members who pressed for immediate answers said they want a clear paper trail showing who authorized and processed the check and why an incorrect signature form was used; other trustees urged handling the matter through personnel procedures and legal counsel.
Ending: The board tabled the bills-for-payment item and intends to address the underlying personnel and procedural questions in executive session; trustees also discussed the possibility of a special meeting to resolve payroll/approval timing if necessary.
