Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Evergreen board adopts consent agendas and a records‑index resolution; agenda adopted at start of meeting

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On Feb. 11 the Evergreen School District Board adopted the meeting agenda, the board consent agenda and the superintendent’s consent agenda by voice votes and approved Resolution 70‑24, a formal statement that the district will not maintain a current index of all records, in compliance with state law.

The Evergreen School District Board of Directors recorded several procedural votes during its Feb. 11 meeting.

• Adopt agenda — Director Grenwelt moved to adopt the meeting agenda as presented; Director Wilson seconded. The board approved by voice vote (Aye).

• Adopt board consent agenda — Director Perkins moved to adopt the board consent agenda as presented; Director Grenwall seconded. The board approved by voice vote (Aye).

• Adopt superintendent consent agenda — Director Grenwap moved to adopt the superintendent consent agenda as presented; Director Bocanegra seconded. The board approved by voice vote (Aye).

• Adopt Resolution 70‑24 — The board adopted Resolution 70‑24, a formal board resolution stating that maintaining a current index of all district records would be unduly burdensome and that the district will follow the state public‑records process. Director Perkins moved adoption; Director Grenwalt seconded. Vote recorded as unanimous voice approval (Aye).

The board chair announced each motion, asked for seconds and recorded unanimous voice approvals for the consent items and the records‑index resolution. The resolution clarifies that the decision not to maintain a full index is intended to comply with Washington state law and does not alter the district’s public‑records process.