Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the K12 Ccp Funding Ban topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Panel backs bill to bar federal education funds for schools receiving Chinese government support

2313149 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee members approved HR 1069 in substitute form, a measure that would prohibit schools from receiving federal education funds if they receive direct or indirect support from the People's Republic of China; debate focused on evidence of K–12 infiltration, administrative burden, and risks of fueling anti‑Asian sentiment.

The committee voted to report HR 1069, the Protect Our Kids Act (described in the markup as promoting responsible oversight to eliminate communist teachings), which would prohibit elementary and secondary schools that receive direct or indirect support from the government of the People's Republic of China from receiving federal education funds.

Representative Kiley, sponsoring an amendment in the nature of a substitute, said the measure would ensure "no federal tax dollars should support schools that partner with the CCP," citing concerns about Confucius classroom programs and other Chinese government influence. "American education should teach American values, not communist propaganda," Kiley said during his remarks.

Democrats and some Republicans questioned the scale of the problem at the K–12 level and warned the bill could impose heavy administrative burdens on already stretched school districts. Representative Bobby Scott said prior investigations found only a small number of Confucius classroom programs in K–12 schools and said the bill's definitions and reporting requirements were broad enough that routine receipts or donations could trigger compliance duties. "This is another example of the majority creating a platform for culture wars while providing no support for really helping students academically," Scott said.

Opponents also warned the measure risked stoking anti‑Asian sentiment and could deter legitimate language and cultural exchange programs. Supporters said the intent is limited to foreign government influence and that waivers and notice provisions are included in the substitute.

The committee adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute and reported HR 1069 to the House; the reported tally on the committee's final vote was 21 yeas and 13 nays. The measure tasks the Department of Education with notice and enforcement responsibilities under the bill's terms.

Votes at a glance HR 1069, Protect Our Kids Act — Committee reported to the House as amended. Final tally on reporting: 21 yeas, 13 nays.

Next steps: The bill will be placed on the committee calendar for floor consideration; the Department of Education would be the implementing agency if the measure becomes law.