Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Committee sends data-center backup-generator bill to environment committee after split vote

2313121 · February 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The House Committee on Energy, Finance and Policy on Feb. 14 referred House File 28 to the Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee after an 8-7 roll call, moving forward a measure that would narrow state certificate-of-need review for standby generation at large data centers and allow some projects to use local AUAR processes instead of PUC site‑permit environmental review.

The House Committee on Energy, Finance and Policy on Feb. 14 referred House File 28 to the Environment and Natural Resources Finance and Policy Committee after an 8-7 roll call, moving forward a measure that would narrow state certificate-of-need review for standby generation at large data centers and allow some projects to use local alternative urban area-wide review (AUAR) processes instead of Public Utilities Commission (PUC) site-permit environmental review.

Representative Mecklen, the bill’s author, framed HF28 as an economic development measure intended to help communities that have lost large power-plant tax bases. “This is going to create a environment where we can be the host state of a tremendous amount of private capital investment,” Representative Mecklen said, arguing data centers could replace lost tax revenue and provide construction and permanent jobs in places such as Becker.

Supporters — including elected officials from Becker, Xcel Energy and several labor unions — told the committee that Becker and other communities face large revenue losses as coal-fired units retire and that AUAR work done locally should not be repeated. Jeremy Schmidt, superintendent of Becker Public Schools, told the committee his district could lose “about 40% or the equivalent of around $5,000,000 out of our $12,000,000 levy” when Sherco units go offline, and called HF28 “a critical opportunity to address those…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans