Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board warned Blueprint will request school land for road extension; appraisals, easement and eminent-domain discussed

2313125 · February 3, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

School Board Member Smith previewed a Blueprint presentation scheduled Feb. 11 seeking county school land (including a parcel in a conservation easement) for a planned road extension; appraised value was cited at roughly $300,000 and staff warned the process could involve eminent-domain steps if co-owners of the easement do not agree.

School Board Member Smith told the board that the Blueprint agency plans to present a proposal on Feb. 11 asking the district to transfer or otherwise make available school-owned land to build a multi-million-dollar road extension that would ease traffic at the Robertson/Mumford area.

The item matters because the proposed alignment would cut through land owned by Leon County Schools, including a parcel subject to a conservation easement held jointly with the Apalachee Land Conservancy; relinquishing or swapping that land has both financial and legal implications for the district.

“...the land that we own has value to it. It has a significant monetary value to it,” Smith said, noting an appraisal the presenters showed placed the combined value of parcels under discussion at about “$300,000.” She said Blueprint had also described a roughly $5,000,000 project to build the extension and that Blueprint had suggested using district proceeds to negotiate with the conservancy over the easement parcel. “They have requested that the board consider giving them that that land,” Smith told colleagues.

Board members and staff explained the property mix: Smith and subsequent speakers described three acres that are not in the conservation easement and about 15 acres that are in an easement. Opal (staff) explained that to remove land from the conservation easement the other co-owner must agree and that, if negotiations fail, Blueprint could pursue an eminent-domain (imminent-domain) action; she said such a legal action requires payment of fair market value and legal determinations in the process.

Board members pressed for clarity on what the district would receive in return and whether there was precedent for giving land to Blueprint. Smith and staff said the early request was exploratory and the district should prepare to evaluate options when Blueprint makes its formal presentation. The administration said Blueprint hoped to reach an agreement by the district’s second meeting in February so the road project could proceed with negotiations with the conservancy.

No board vote or commitment was requested at the meeting; members were given a heads-up and asked to review materials when Blueprint presents its maps and appraisal. Staff noted a roughly 30-day statutory window would apply for the board to act once a formal offer is filed.