Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Site Design Litter Aesthetics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Applicant seeks side-yard dumpster enclosure at 3588 Broad St.; staff recommends approval with conditions
Summary
Emissary Trading Company requested a variance to build an 8-foot wood dumpster enclosure in the front/side yard at 3588 Broad Street; staff recommended approval with conditions requiring design complementary to the principal structure and director approval of materials and details.
At a Jan. 16 Chamblee work session, planning staff presented a variance request for 3588 Broad Street to construct a commercial dumpster enclosure in the side/front yard where the site has little to no rear yard.
John Maximuck, planning and development director, explained the property’s building footprint leaves insufficient rear yard for a lawfully placed dumpster; the applicant proposes an 8-foot wood enclosure at the current dumpster location in the northeast corner of the site. Staff recommended approval with conditions: that the enclosure be constructed substantially in conformity with the plan submitted 12/04/2024 and that its design and materials be similar to and complementary with the existing primary structure, with final design approval by the planning and development director.
Jade Boyer of Emissary Trading Company, 3580 Broad Street, described operational constraints: trucks cannot access the rear, the site abuts woods, and a brick enclosure would be cost-prohibitive. Boyer said the applicant plans durable construction, wheels on the enclosure to enable collection, and a quality finish.
Nearby residents and Council member Leslie Robson raised concerns about visibility from Broad Street, material durability of wood enclosures, door hardware and closure, and potential encroachment into loading/parking areas when doors swing outward. Robson asked staff and the applicant to consider moving the enclosure farther back toward the property line where possible and adding vegetative screening along the street-facing side. The applicant agreed to push the enclosure back as much as feasible and indicated willingness to add plantings; staff said final material and planting plans would be subject to department approval and could be codified as conditions if council approves.
No formal council vote occurred at the work session; staff recommended approval with the stated conditions and oversight by the planning director.
