Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lower Lake Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
GPAC pauses Lower Lake land‑use change pending water‑availability information
Summary
The GPAC reviewed LAPAC recommendations for Lower Lake and voted to ask staff to return with more information about water availability before endorsing a proposed land‑use designation change; public speakers raised concerns about agriculture, water supply and potential subdivision pressure.
The General Plan Advisory Committee (GPAC) paused action on a Lower Lake land‑use designation change after hearing concerns about water supply and community preference for preserving agricultural uses.
The LAPAC had proposed two clusters of changes in Lower Lake: one group of parcels along Morgan Valley Road to move from rural residential to suburban residential reserve to align with adjacent suburban parcels and existing utilities, and another cluster near Siegler Springs to change from suburban residential reserve to local commercial as part of a longer‑term hamlet/mixed‑use redevelopment concept.
Why it matters: several public commenters and GPAC members said water availability and community values should be better documented before endorsing a change that could enable future subdivision. "It would be premature for us right now to go ahead and green light this decision for this change," GPAC member Margo Kambara said, urging additional analysis of water demand and supply. Public commenters emphasized a desire to preserve small‑scale agricultural uses and warned that converting ag or rural lands can be difficult to reverse.
Motion and outcome: GPAC member Margo Kambara moved that the committee "request that staff bring back more information about water availability to the parcels affected by the proposed Lower Lake zoning change." Donna Makowitz seconded. The committee voted in favor; the motion passed and staff committed to return with additional information for GPAC and Board consideration. The motion did not change the LAPAC recommendation itself; it asks staff to provide supplemental analysis for the Board.
Public input: Multiple speakers urged caution. Resident Wes Baker described how fire footprints and human‑caused fires affect how hazard maps are interpreted and urged public comment to CAL FIRE during the 90‑day review. Farmer and longtime resident Norman Kimes urged protecting larger agricultural parcels and warned that smaller lot subdivision can erode local food production. Several LAPAC members and property owners said the parcels in question are adjacent to utilities and community growth boundaries and argued the proposed designation change would be compatible with surrounding uses.
Ending: Staff said they would attempt to contact Lower Lake Water and other service providers and return the item to GPAC with more complete water‑availability and infrastructure information; in the meantime LAPAC recommendations will remain part of the record forwarded to the Board.
