Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Procedural Votes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Votes at a glance: Livingston Planning Commission, Feb. 11, 2025

2309559 · February 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Planning Commission approved the meeting agenda and two sets of minutes by recorded roll-call votes. No substantive ordinances or rezones were adopted at the session; the commission opened and closed a public hearing on the general-plan alternatives and requested staff follow-up.

The Livingston City Planning Commission took the following recorded actions at its Feb. 11, 2025 meeting.

Agenda approval • Motion: Approve the agenda as published. • Mover: Commissioner Jose Flores. • Seconder: Vice Chair Renee Mendonca. • Vote (roll call): Jas Nelsen — yes; Jose Flores — yes; Renee Mendonca — yes; Steve Bassi — yes; Diego Castillo — yes. • Outcome: Approved (5–0).

Approval of minutes — 5A (Oct. 8, 2024) • Motion: Approve minutes of Oct. 8, 2024. • Mover: Commissioner Jose Flores (staff record indicates a motion was made); Seconder: Jasneel Singh (listed in roll call as seconding subsequent motions in the meeting record). • Vote (roll call): Jas Nelsen — yes; Jose Flores — yes; Renee Mendonca — yes; Steve Bassi — yes; Diego Castillo — yes. • Outcome: Approved (5–0).

Approval of minutes — 5B (Dec. 10, 2024) • Motion: Approve minutes of Dec. 10, 2024. • Mover: Commissioner Jose Flores. • Seconder: Commissioner Jasneel Singh (meeting record notes a second). • Vote (roll call): Jas Nelsen — yes; Jose Flores — yes; Renee Mendonca — yes; Steve Bassi — yes; Diego Castillo — yes. • Outcome: Approved (5–0).

Other items • The commission opened a public hearing (item 8) on the general-plan land-use alternatives, received extensive public comment and consultant presentations, and asked staff to prepare a revised hybrid preferred alternative map. No final land-use designation or sphere-of-influence amendment was adopted.

Notes on attribution: roll‑call names reflect how individuals were recorded in the meeting transcript. If a transcript contained minor variations in spelling for a commissioner name (for example "Jas Nelsen" and later "Jasneel Singh"), the roll call votes above follow the recorded roll-call list; the minutes should be consulted for the official spelling of commissioner names and votes.