Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Stormwater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Peoria holds first reading of updated stormwater rules; staff says changes target new development, not rate increases
Summary
Council received a first reading of ordinance updates to stormwater-management language and retention tables; public-works director said changes affect new development standards and will not raise rates for existing customers.
Get email alerts on the Stormwater topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Peoria City Council received a first reading Tuesday of an ordinance that would update stormwater-management language in the city's code, revise retention tables and align standards with industry practice.
Director Powers, public works director for the city of Peoria, told the council the changes "are cleanup" that primarily update tables and definitions and adopt new industry standards for retention in new developments. "This is not in any way affecting rates for anyone that has existing rates," Powers said. "It's gonna affect more so new development and retention values in that regard." He also said staff clarified some definitions surrounding penalties but did not propose penalty increases.
Council Member Cyr asked whether the proposed rules would apply to pending development reviews. Director Powers said they would not apply to existing development; for applications pending at adoption, Powers deferred to corporation counsel and said the effective date would likely be the date of adoption after second reading. The director noted staff had been in conversations with at least one subdivision applicant, Gray Oak, and that the applicants were aware of the new tables and their potential marginal impact on that review.
Why it matters: The proposed changes would alter technical retention requirements used in plan reviews for new construction and could affect developers' stormwater calculations and on-site retention design. Staff said the changes are largely technical and focused on aligning the code with current industry standards rather than creating new fees for current customers.
Council took no final vote on the ordinance at first reading beyond a motion to receive and file the item for consideration; the council approved that procedural motion. Corporation counsel will advise staff and the council about effective-date language and whether pending applications should be re-evaluated under the new tables.
Ending note: Staff said they will return with a final ordinance and more detailed data if the council requests it before second reading.

